ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3850|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

美国大学评为A+的驳论文格式,供参考

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-17 00:54:00 | 只看该作者

美国大学评为A+的驳论文格式,供参考

驳论文重要的几个方面

第一段一定要有主题句.主题句就是表明你立场的句子.注意,有的人喜欢两个方面都考虑. 其实这是大忌.两方面都赞同有的时候会confuse读者.最好就是同意一方面到底!

文章主体一定要从正面,反面去讨论,一定要把结果讨论到.多举例子支持自己的观点.也不要用自己的假设去支持,有的时候很明显的假设对很多人来说不成立.就要很多权威的数据来支持你的论点.

有的人喜欢在结尾前讨论下反面观点的长处,其实根本就是多此一举,这么做就削弱了你的驳论.

下面一个范文仅供参考.

Do you think students attend single-sex school can be more academically successful or students attend co-ed school can be more academically successful?

Why Co-ed School

 

       The Bush administration regards same-sex education as a cure-all for what ails the nation's public schools. Part of this may be true if they think males and females need different styles of education and attention.However, in the 21st century, in such a competitive society, a female can’t request to be treated differently in a job because she is a female. Co-ed schools not only nurture students to be academically successful through equality, but also provide them with an environment that they can’t obtain from single-sex schools. (主题句)

 注意!有的人喜欢用句子象"下面我要提供我的观点","下面我要就这个论点去讨论"之类的,这样的句子实际上是多余的,也在一开始就暴露你的缺点,切记!

        Wendy Kaminer, a Smith graduate said, “All female schools are ‘models of equivocation’. They reinforce regressive notions of sex difference while at the same time helping women into professions.” In 70s and 80s, it was relatively liberal for women to be educated in same-sex schools; they were well aware of the differences in education for boys and girls and the abilities that each gender had on different things. However, women, most of the time, were stereotyped as only good at housework, clerical job, nursing, and child education. On the other hand, men were considered the main support to a family, and generally capable of doing more than women. This view has been gradually changed over the years. Women are trying to improve their roles in society, and they strive to prove they can be just as good as men. If sex segregation continues, female students in same-sex schools will not be given equal chance to see they may do better or even excel over men.(支持SINGLE-SEX SCHOOL的结果)

 

(举例)

        I am a great example to support this standpoint. I’ve attended a co-ed school since I was seven years old. My classmates and I had been told by some teachers that girls couldn’t excel on scientific subjects. Although it was wrong of the teachers to say such discouraging words to female students, I never gave up on studying scientific subjects harder. By neglecting such comments from teachers and concentrating on studying math, physics, and chemistry, I achieved better grades and surpassed most boys in my class with the efforts I had put in. It is important that women be put in equal nurturing and competing positions, with no conscious influencing thoughts that women are inferior on some aspects compared to men. They can prove themselves as good as men on academics and in career choices.

 

       Secondly, co-ed schools provide an interactive environment for boys and girls to study together so they can learn from each other.(支持CO-ED SCHOOL的正面论点) It’s true that there are clear distinctions between males and females. However, by separating them and giving different educational concepts, they may still develop their individual academic strength, but they won’t be able to observe or compare advantages and disadvantages between males and females in the same situation.(先说明SINGLE-SEX SCHOOL的正面,然后提出它的弱点) (举例) For example, in a research assignment, a male student can do mechanical jobs efficiently, but he may lack the ability to organize and find faults whereas a female student who is better at these aspects may help him. Thus, the male student can benefit from this cooperation and learn how to perform better next time. The same applies to the girl in learning as regards the mechanical skills from her male partner. Co-ed schools provide the reciprocal and interactive opportunities for male and female students so that they can learn from each other and make progress simultaneously.

 

        It is not only academic strength that makes a student successful in the future – social skills, teamwork spirit, and networking prolongs the success on career paths. Single-sex schools can potentially form a “false protection” for boys and girls in the long run.(反面) Boys and girls in same-sex schools only communicate and make friends with the same sex. On the contrary, co-ed school is like a miniature of the society. Coed school’s students not only interact with everyone on a daily basis, but also their social horizons can be enlarged. They make male and female friends who may become their future “business partners” or “social guides”. Boys learn how to communicate with girls in teamwork; girls’ confidence is enhanced when both male and female classmates acknowledge them.

 

     Our ultimate goal is to make the education system better. Sex segregation makes it harder to find a good way to educate students comprehensively and make both genders’ academic progresses parallel. Only by considering both genders as a unified entity can we overcome the academic shortcomings of the educational system. Boys and girls educated in a co-ed system can then have a wider scope of future accomplishments.(再次强调自己的论点)


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-17 1:03:35编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-4-17 02:33:00 | 只看该作者
thx!
板凳
发表于 2007-4-17 11:54:00 | 只看该作者

thanks for sharing!

地板
发表于 2007-4-17 15:17:00 | 只看该作者
i appreciate it and expect more examples if i may
5#
发表于 2007-5-3 21:56:00 | 只看该作者

Good!

6#
发表于 2007-5-5 20:10:00 | 只看该作者
thank you !
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-19 21:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部