ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (VIVL)

00:00:00

"Fast cycle time" is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production, but it also ensures quality. The reason is that the bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.

The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2858|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-110

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-10 14:18:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-110

OG 11-110:

110. "Fast cycle time" is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production, but it also ensures quality. The reason is
                    that the bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.

            

The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that____

(A)           any flaw in work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occurring on a "fast cycle" production line

(B)           the strategy of "fast cycle time" would require fundamental rethinking of product design

(C)          the primary goal of the organization is to produce a product of unexcelled quality, 
            
rather than to generate profits for
stockholders
            

(D)          "fast cycle time" could be achieved by shaving time off each of the component processes in a production cycle

(E)         "fast cycle time" is a concept in business strategy that has not yet been put into practice in a factory

请教本题思路.

请教本题思路.

沙发
发表于 2007-4-12 07:13:00 | 只看该作者

首先题目的意思是:快速生产周期是把生产组织塑造成为一个消除生产瓶颈和延迟的战略。这一战略不仅仅加快了生产速度,而且保证了质量。原因是,除非所有的工作都在第一时间内正确地完成(我理解成保质保量的完成),否则生产瓶颈和生产的延迟不可避免。

题目问的有2个要点:第一找出前提,第二找出有疑问的前提

首先找前提,最后一句话说得很明白,必要条件就是unless all work is done right the first time(保质保量)

A选项就是这一必要条件反过来说:不保质保量导致瓶颈和延迟从而导致战略失败(注意ALL 和 ANY的对应)

然后至于A选项有疑问的地方OG解释得很清楚了:It is entirely possible that there might be flaws that might not cause such problems; thus, the assumption is questionable.

其他的选项感觉不相关

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-17 13:04:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢解答。有道理。

地板
发表于 2007-9-11 21:32:00 | 只看该作者
5#
发表于 2007-10-12 05:08:00 | 只看该作者

我比较愚钝,对于这题到底在问什么还是不太了解,问题的意思是否是:

“上文关于保证质量的阐述是建立在下面哪一个有疑问的前提上?”

这个“有疑问的前提”是指能够解释论点(即关于质量的那段文字),但是在客观上又不完全正确的前提,是吗?

6#
发表于 2008-1-2 14:36:00 | 只看该作者
3x
7#
发表于 2008-3-2 23:24:00 | 只看该作者

回复OG11-110

OG 11-110:

110. "Fast cycle time" is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production, but it also ensures quality. The reason is
      that the bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.

    

The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that____

(A)           any flaw in work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occurring on a "fast cycle" production line

(B)           the strategy of "fast cycle time" would require fundamental rethinking of product design

(C)          the primary goal of the organization is to produce a product of unexcelled quality, 
    
rather than to generate profits for
stockholders
    

(D)          "fast cycle time" could be achieved by shaving time off each of the component processes in a production cycle

(E)         "fast cycle time" is a concept in business strategy that has not yet been put into practice in a factory.

答案为A

我为我的困惑很困惑,我就不明白答案让找的是假设,可A答案是从原文最后一句话推理出来的,没有构成假设啊??


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-2 23:25:00编辑过]
8#
发表于 2008-3-4 22:08:00 | 只看该作者
UP!
9#
发表于 2008-3-14 21:03:00 | 只看该作者
UP
10#
发表于 2008-3-16 21:03:00 | 只看该作者

要说做题,这道题真是不难,BCDE都是典型的无关项,一扫答案就出来了!

要说逻辑,有点意思!

正如卡小姐所言,A能不能成为文章的假设呢?

呵呵,这里有一个很有意思的逻辑中的逻辑问题!也涉及到一个审题的问题,题目中问得是什么?

"the claim about quality made above...." 那么这个Claim是什么:FCT can ensure quality。对吧!它的presupposition 是什么,是不是 the reason is that....的内容?而且从正常人的逻辑来讲(我个人一直强调GMAT考得就是正常人的逻辑),这个内容是不是 quetionable?

如果您对以上的内容回到都是:是。那么如果把the reason is that...后面的内容写到选项你,你选还是不选?

A就是这些内容的逆否命题啊!也就是等价命题。当然是答案!

不知道说明白没有?也不知道对不对,还请斧正!本人是这样认为的,呵呵!

To Dear 卡小姐:

俺在很多帖子看到过您说就是不能攻击文章前提的说法!对这个,我一直不明白,迫切想向您请教。还望不吝赐教啊!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 05:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部