|
At present the Hollywood restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaces some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that:
A. Some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall table if they were available B. The price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals. C.A customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering D.A restaurant’s customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meal longer E. With enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood’s customers interested in such stating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
C 请教, 考试时,做这样的题用什么样的解题思路节省时间?
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-8 11:04:36编辑过] |