|
In 1992, a major newspaper circulated throughout North American paid its reporters an 说在这年，一家遍及被美的主要报纸说啊，发给记者的平均工资都是跟他们竞争对手发 average salary paid by its principle competitors to their reporters. An executive of the 给他们的记者的原则是一样的。这个报纸的一个执委会的成员争论说阿， newspaper argued that this practice was justified, since any shortfall that might exist in the 这个原则是正确的是值得讨论的，任何一个不足（什么不足呢，可能遵在在发给记者的工资上）是 reporters' salaries is fully compensated by the valuable training they receive through their 不能全部偿还他们培训的钱，通过他们的安排 assignments. 原文说的是：记者挣不挣钱的问题，企业赔不赔钱的问题
Which one of the following, if true about the newspaper in 1992, most seriously undermines the justification offered by the executive?
问题：底下的哪个如果是真的关于报纸说的在这年，
更能削弱这个执委会的家伙说的。
A.Senior reporters at the newspaper earned as much as reporters of similar stature who worked for the mewspaper's principle competitors.
说一个高级记者（啥记者呢，在报纸中的）挣的跟另一个记者（在竞争对手工作的）一样多。主体：说了挣不挣钱（具体是谁挣得无关紧要）
B.Most of the newspaper's reporters had worked there for more than ten years. 大多数报纸的记者工作在这的比10年前努力（有人选这个是因为自己加了东西，加的东西是大多数记者工作努力了，时间长了就应该挣得高啊。请问原文告诉你这个了吗？这个是你自己臆测出来的，美国人很傻的，原文不说的我们一概都不知道）
C.The circulation of the newspaper had recently reached a plateau, after it had increased steadily throughout the 1980s. 这个报纸的发行额最近高了，在80年代稳步增加后（无关）
D.The union that represented reporters at the newspaper was different from the union that represented reporters at the newspaper's competitors. 这个联盟（什么联盟呢，代表记者的（什么记者呢，在这个报纸的））是不同的联盟（什么联盟呢，代表记者的（什么记者呢，在竞争对手的））（无关）
E.The newspaper was widely read throughout continental Europe and Great Britain as well as North America. 这个报纸在欧洲、英国跟在美国一样出名。（无关）
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-17 15:45:18编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-11-18 15:54:00
