ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1295|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei 99

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-23 09:12:00 | 只看该作者

feifei 99

Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.
Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.
In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?

(C) rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim
(D) disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion

我选了d,因为alicia一跑上来就先说“franchot was not a great writer”,这句不就是dispute concetta’s conclusion吗?
沙发
发表于 2007-3-24 00:48:00 | 只看该作者

Besides之前否定了原文的评价标准,Besides之后否定了原文中ahead of her time in understanding...

正好符合C的内容,D的主要问题是没有指出Besides之后对Concetta的a specific claim的否定。

PLUS:Franchot was a great writer. 这样的句子应该是典型的作者的评价。

板凳
发表于 2009-5-20 19:46:00 | 只看该作者

understand

thank you!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 07:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部