2006年中欧世界排名11，长江却没能上100名，但是长江的学费却要贵许多，为什么呢？

klipper

Huh, I know a lot about how an unsuccessful salesperson or a inexperienced marketer feels, because I was there. They are under unbelievable hugh pressure.

Let me try to answer the question a little bit. If the cost of indentifying the quality of one product is too high, the price itself would become a benchmark. OK. For example, God think you are a nice guy and God know you want to buy a diamond ring to your siganificant another. God decided to pay for any one dimond ring that you like. But you do not know anything about diamond except for " the bigger, the better" stuff. And none of your close friends have such knowledge for indentifying diamond. What would you do to choose a GOOD one? Yes, you are looking for the most expensive ones. That should be a very good dimond ring.

Rankings, on the other hand, are also trying to reduce the indentifying cost of MBA programs. Because the candidates of MBA will drop his/ her current job and spend some 18 months to learn full timely without any job income. That's a big decision. Rankings gives them some benchmark to help them to choose one out of hundreds.

So, candidates usually use tuitions and rankings(different rankings) to get a rough idea of how good is your program. However, I think both of them are not good. And no self-respect candidates would make decisions just based on tuition or rankings or both. If I were you guys, I would try to find out somebody in the program who's having similar background. I would spend days to talk with this person, to talk every detail out. And the very first questions would be " How do you think this program help you to succeed in your career?"

Peace.

DongFeng

很久没来了，说几句

对学生来说，你直接能受益的是教你的人的水平有多高，不是有句话么：“脑袋决定口袋，眼界决定境界”，长江的教授多去考察考察，先不要管是不是什么访问不访问，能来上课教东西就行了。。。

至于排名，呵呵，将来一定会的。排名和学费一定有关系么？举个例子，世界上有很多名车，没见过排名，天价，照样人人肯定，为什么？。。。

再说了，长江的奖学金制度了解后就知道贵不贵了。。。

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-17 1:41:25编辑过]

foever

下面是我的一个帖子，供大家参考。

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=16&ID=234036&page=1

长江为什么不参加排名

        关于排名，大家比较关心。我参加过和项兵院长的座谈，也听过他和申请者的解释，在这里和大家分享一下吧。
            

        长江的思路大概是这样的：先重点搞EDP、EMBA，比如和沃顿、INSEAD、哥伦比亚合作就非常成功（我如果说最好又会受到攻击了），这样可以先招些“牛学生”，让牛校认识，然后再进一步谈MBA的合作就容易了。我们坦然，MBA学生质量很难和TOP10相比，但EDP是没问题的，看看学生名单就知道了（牛根生、马云、施正荣等）。
       当然，有些合作现在也可以，比如03和沃顿就有交换，但那是有求如人，由长江出钱的单项交换，不是平等合作。和INSEAD，
            哥伦比亚的交换好像也在谈，等消息了。
       同时在招牛教授，今年力度很大，哥伦比亚的院长来长江，看了教授名单，他说有6个教授认识，好，我们来谈合作，所以今年就合作了，哈佛积极在与长江谈合作。项兵说他们选合作独享第一是看教授不是排名，牛教授之间互相都认识，不需要其他的证明。
　　项兵认为开始牛校、牛教授、牛学生的认可比排名要重要，所以不参加排名，排名过两年是水到渠成的事。他可能觉得时机不成熟，如同IPO，时机不好，价格差异会很大。

benu365

我觉得“klipper”说得很有道理，只是我现在一时没有办法try to find out somebody in the program who's having similar
background. I would spend days to talk with this person, to talk every
detail out.所以在这里和大家讨论，也是一种方法，不是吗

lifeup

全球11！！这可比美国很多名校值钱多了！！！

easeheart

楼上说得好,我也有过类似的疑问。不知者不为过，不必如此敏感。

JSROY

吵吵?吵吵!

挺好,

请继续

zzlz

其实问这个问题也很正常,毕竟国内很多方面不成熟,包括消费观念,读MBA,也算一种消费吧.

当然,我这么说并不表明我感觉这价格正常,当我自己比较学费的时候想法和标题是一样的.

希望长江是脚踏实地的,价格不是一个纯商业行为.

希望长江是因为好价格高,而不是因为价格高才让你认为我好.

benu365

还有一个疑问：
关于学习时间，长江是12个月，中欧18个月，北大国际18个月，不知道12个月好呢还是18个月好？想听听前辈的意见，我菜鸟一个学习中，想长点见识。

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-30 16:08:13编辑过]

sinoyuan

建议你具体向3所学校了解一下，我印象中实际课程学习时间是差不多的