GWD-23-Q1。 请教NN们

bluevivi001

GWD-23-Q1

A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays for special procedures prescribed by physicians only if the procedure is first approved as “medically necessary” by a company-appointed review panel.  The rule is intended to save the company the money it might otherwise spend on medically unnecessary procedures.  The company has recently announced that in order to reduce its costs, it will abandon this rule.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest justification for the company’s decision?

A.       Patients often register dissatisfaction with physicians who prescribe nothing for their ailments.

B.       Physicians often prescribe special procedures that are helpful but not altogether necessary for the health of the patient.

C.       The review process is expensive and practically always results in approval of the prescribed procedure.

D.       The company’s review process does not interfere with the prerogative of physicians, in cases where more than one effective procedure is available, to select the one they personally prefer.

E.        The number of members of the company-appointed review panel who review a given procedure depends on the cost of the procedure.

 

答案是C, 我选B. 请问B是出了什么问题啊？多谢！　（大脑极度混乱中。。。）

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-2-26 23:41:30编辑过]

bluevivi001

刚才又想了想。 好像有点头绪了！Ｂ　说医生会同意那些有帮助但是不必要的special procedures,  但医生是否同意和支出无关。
                应该是七宗罪里的HASTY GENERALIZATION吧！　请NN们帮我看一下， 我的思路对吗？

Tira

顶一下 我也是选的B  我觉得支出与否就是根据医生的单子啊......

Tira

UP

addy

在网上搜了一下 答案似乎是C 如果答案是B的话 有点难理解了

linuxzh

C.       The review process is expensive and practically always results in approval of the prescribed procedure.

其实C就是公司决定取消的理由啊,所以加强.

"这个review的过程是昂贵的,但是结果又都是合理的治疗方案",那公司当然取消这个 rule 了.   

其实C就是公司决定取消的理由啊,所以加强.

"这个review的过程是昂贵的,但是结果又都是合理的治疗方案",那公司当然取消这个 rule 了.