|
作文： AA: “This past winter, 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. The other 12,000 Waymarsh students evidently weren’t so concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Since the group who did not protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the state’s college students than are the protesters. Therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals of the protesting students.” “This past winter, 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. The other 12,000 Waymarsh students evidently weren’t so concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. Since the group who did not protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the state’s college students than are the protesters. Therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals of the protesting students.” AI: 阅读居然碰到三篇JJ! 第一篇： 木星卫星
木星有颗卫星较其它卫星表面平滑，原因不是陨石撞击较少
，而是该卫星含有大量水份及冰，当陨石撞击水及冰的海面后
，海面会回复原况，所以看起来很平滑
。第二段是另一个该卫星有水的证明。
2.(xue3y 2006-1-09 北美)：
讲木星的表面和其它行星不太一样，假设了一个理由，是个短文章，就两段。
3.(ldaaawg 2006-1-20) 木星的卫星问题~
4.(ILOSTME 2006-1-25 地点不详)
5，（bblawbt 2006-1-26广州）：木星的卫星, 陨石坑, 平整.. 类比地球...
6.（gujianp2002 2006-1-20 北美）:木星有颗卫星较其它卫星表面平滑，原因不是陨石撞击较少
，而是该卫星含有大量水份及冰，当陨石撞击水及冰的海面后
，海面会回复原况，所以看起来很平滑
。第二段是另一个该卫星有水的证明。
第二篇： (The following was excerpted from material written in 1988.) For over a decade the
most common policy advice given to developing countries Line
by international development (5) institutions has been to copy the export-oriented path of the newly industrializing countries, the celebrated NIC’s. These economies—Brazil, Hong (10) Kong, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan— burst into the world manufac- turing market in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s; by 1978 these (15) six economies, along with India, enjoyed unequaled growth rates for gross national product and for exports, with exports accounting for 70 percent of (20) the developing world’s manu- factured exports. It was, therefore, not surprising that dozens of other countries attempted to follow their model, (25) yet no countries—with the pos- sible exceptions of Malaysia and Thailand—have even approached their success. In “No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad (30) and John Cavanagh search for the reasons behind these fail- ures, identifying far-reaching changes in the global econ- omy—from synthetic substitutes (35)
for commodity exports to unsustainable levels of foreign debt—as responsible for a glut economy offering little room for new entrants. Despite these (40) changes, the authors maintain, the World Bank and the Inter- national Monetary Fund—the foremost international devel- opment institutions—have (45) continued to promote the NIC path as the way for heavily indebted developing countries to proceed. And yet the futility of this approach should, (50) according to the authors, be all too apparent so many years into a period of reduced growth in world markets. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q35: 这道题换了，换成了主旨题。我记得我的答案和问题，但是为了不扰乱大家，我建议你自己想想这篇文章的主旨是为了干什么吧。 Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s? - Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.
- By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.
- In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.
- In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.
- They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.
Answer: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q36: 这道题一样 The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following? - The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
- The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
- The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
- The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
- The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy
Answer: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q37: 这道题一样 The author mentions Malaysia and Thailand in order to - acknowledge the appearance of implausibility in a broad claim
- concede the possible existence of counter-examples to a generalization
- offer additional evidence in support of a disputed conclusion
- illustrate the broad applicability of a hypothesis
- admit the limited scope of a standard analysis
第三篇： 9．怎样减轻地震对桥梁和建筑的影响 第一段先讲如果地震的振频（？）和桥的振频一样，会加大晃动桥梁的力量。然后讲一个理论，不仅适用于新建桥梁还可以改造旧的桥梁。 第二段讲这个理论具体的应用。让地面的振动不会损坏地面上的建筑。
老吴补充：文章分两段，第一段讲如果地震波的频率跟桥的震动频率一样，会加大桥的晃动。（即使说这是一个安全难题）；有一个很老的设计桥的理论，叫“seismisic isolation”，具体如下面那个version2所说。第二段详细讲这种理论的作用原理，不过是在建筑物上的应用。也就是在建筑物下面加一个滑动的东西，地震的时候，建筑物可以前后滑动，从而抵消掉地震波，保护建筑物。
第四篇： 三四段。讲公司的做市场调查的策略——两种策略的比较。我回忆回忆再补充吧。。。 Version2 讲seimisic isolation的,主要讲earthquake会让bridge broken, 应该一个很老的idea 设计bridge, 叫seismisic isolation,就是在bridge与ground接触的地方放一些sliding-friction之类的,这个可以吸收地震波，可以左右动...
数学： 数学遇到的JJ极少，确定的有两道，不确定的好象顶多也就还有2道（难道好运气都让阅读JJ占去了？） 1. 一个半径为5的圆内接一个正六边形，求圆面积大于正六边形部分的阴影面积。 2. 有x个人，共花了d元干一个事，本来说AA，但后来12个人退出，问剩余每个人还要摊多少钱？或者问最终每个人共花多少钱？（记不清了）这是一道确定的原JJ题。 3.1x+y1<1x1+1y1 ? (1代表绝对值） a. x+y<0 ; b. y>0 4. 1x1<x^2 有好几个值，然后有选项是: a. Only I; b. I and II ... 这个题画出函数图，就不难。 5. 两个不等式，简单变形后是这样的：y>x-3, y<-x+5，从下面5个图形选择它们的交集图像（阴影部分）。很简单。 （明天再加吧....） 逻辑： 1. 碰到一道GWD： 第一道：就是政府以前有两次通过货币贬值促进出口，现在又想再来一次贬值促进出口，问weaken那道。答案是工厂都满负荷运行了。
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-2-26 22:53:30编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-2-26 18:25:00
楼主
