Plantings of cotton bioengineered to produce its own insecticide against bollworms, a major cause of crop failure, sustained little bollworm damage until this year. This year the plantings are being seriously damaged by bollworms. Bollworms, however, are not necessarily developing resistance to the cotton’s insecticide. Bollworms breed on corn, and last year more corn than usual was planted throughout cotton-growing regions. So it is likely that the cotton is simply being overwhelmed by corn-bred bollworms.
In evaluating the argument, which of the following would be most useful to establish?
- Whether corn could be bioengineered to produce the insecticide
- Whether plantings of cotton that does not produce the insecticide are suffering unusually extensive damage from bollworms this year
- Whether other crops that have been bioengineered to produce their own insecticide successfully resist the pests against which the insecticide was to protect them
- Whether plantings of bioengineered cotton are frequently damaged by insect pests other than bollworms
- Whether there are insecticides that can be used against bollworms that have developed resistance to the insecticide produced by the bioengineered cotton
这题我怎么觉得没有一个答案对啊,想不通,请求NN们帮忙点拨一下,有人说是选B,理由是回答YES则说明是吃玉米导致棉虫不怕杀虫剂,NO则说明是棉虫自身产生抗药性。我觉得说不通啊,难道说产生抗药性的棉虫就不吃普通棉花了吗?我不知道从生物上说是不是这样的,但是AT LEAST这不是一个能作为常识的ASSUMPTION啊,晕~ 我SUPPOSE答案的方向应该是受到有没有周围没有玉米的抗虫棉花受到虫灾?若YES说明是棉虫自身产生抗药性,NO说明是吃玉米导致棉虫不怕杀虫剂。我是不是想岔了大家来帮帮忙啊。。 |