英国《金融时报》2007年MBA排名(FINANCIAL TIMES MBA 2007) 全球排名前100位全职MBA课程

davidli8888

The question is how to make use of the ranking? Ranking has its own credibility issues; All the criteria for the ranking are fairly for each school?

abc_on_line

One of the statistics used by Financial Times is the increase rate of salary before MBA and post MBA, which can explain why, en, what's the name of the school in Shang Hai, yes Zhong Ou, can be ranked as top 20. 

For instance, if a man earning salary 2,000 per month gets into that school, then post MBA, even if he can find a job which only pays him 4,000 per month, his salary would double....For the real top business schools, doubling salary is not easy.  The starting points are different.  So, you guys know how Zhong Ou can take advantage of this FT ranking lah.

I respect FT.  They strictly stick to their ranking rules though they know it's sort of out of track in some cases.

dingjinsong

even though I like FT, and read this magazine a lot, but 2007 ranking really confuse me, because there are too much dramatical change.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-29 19:00:55编辑过]

liaojun2000

It's a tricky number. Do you believe the average salary of a CEIBS graduate is 146,410$ per year? Even counted by CPI, does 25Wrmb per year in China equal 15W$ in US?

Funny ranking.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-29 20:38:32编辑过]

goodssb

这种排名我也受不了了

flyingceleste

中欧11名？今天4月1号？

gonghao

以下是引用flyingceleste在2007-1-29 22:18:00的发言：
中欧11名？今天4月1号？

呵呵

年还没过呢：）

royzhujian

无法再相信FT的排名了,还是US news的客观点...