[原创]CR快速排除选项法~~心得分享

cynthia0610

谢谢分享～～～

chang2301

回复shenyang mm~~

有关第三题的C

因为这题是assumption题

基本上都要找一个肯定的前提

C是属于一个可有可无的选项

因为他用了would

就是说可能ineffective也可能不会ineffective

所以无法当作前提使用

你自己也可以取非是看看啰

第四题:

因为文章的题目是问

Which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that the plan, if put into effect, will not increase Paper&rint’s profits?

这个Paper&rint’s就是retailer

所以可知文章要的是有关retailer’s profit的讯息

而不是publisher的

基本上像这样的选项都是无关选项喔

shenyang

谢谢GG，关于4题明白了，可对于3题还是有些不清楚，类似的题我总是排不出无关选项，如OG11-86：我觉得选项D也是一个削弱的他因，刚刚才做完OG11,一头雾水，还请多指教！

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?

D. Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given years.

E. Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.（答案：E)

对D的解释不太清楚, 解释如下：

D. If the accelerators can be used for multiple experiments, then it is reasonable to expect more articles related to them, not fewer.

chang2301

以下是引用shenyang在2007-1-15 11:16:00的发言：

谢谢GG，关于4题明白了，可对于3题还是有些不清楚，类似的题我总是排不出无关选项，如OG11-86：我觉得选项D也是一个削弱的他因，刚刚才做完OG11,一头雾水，还请多指教！

Journalist: In physics journals, the number of articles reporting the results of experiments involving particle accelerators was lower last year than it had been in previous years. Several of the particle accelerators at major research institutions were out of service the year before last for repairs, so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the journalist's argument?

D. Particle accelerators can be used for more than one group of experiments in any given years.

E. Recent changes in the editorial policies of several physics journals have decreased the likelihood that articles concerning particle-accelerator research will be accepted for publication.（答案：E)

对D的解释不太清楚, 解释如下：

对D的解释不太清楚, 解释如下：

D. If the accelerators can be used for multiple experiments, then it is reasonable to expect more articles related to them, not fewer.

D. If the accelerators can be used for multiple experiments, then it is reasonable to expect more articles related to them, not fewer.

文章的结论是

so it is likely that the low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators

表示是这个journalist在为这个现象找一个原因

所以要weaken这个题目

最简单的方法就是否定他说的这个原因

像E所说是policy change造成的而不是availability造成的

D虽然也找了一个原因

不过这个原因会lead to另一个结果:number of articles变多而非减少

仔细体会一下差别喔

其实做这些题目没什么诀窍

大家一开始都差不多

做久了就会有感觉了

等你一两个月之后再看同一题

一定会有不同的感受的

加油!

shenyang

不好意思死脑筋，还是不明白，GG解释说不过这个原因会lead to另一个结果:number of articles变多而非减少那不是正说明the low number of articles 不是 due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators吗？是我太转牛角尖了么，知道答案是E，可是还是转不过这个弯来，好像天生没有逻辑思维能力

cosuede

我不是nn，说一点我的想法

关于第三题，我觉得是明显违背逻辑常识的，自话自说，把结论改写了一遍。这样的选项不能选

关于第四题，楼上不明白的D，我觉得那个是support了，不是undermine了。因为结论是说正是因为加速器的减少才导致的，而d选项反过来说要是加速器增加就不会。所以不对。

chang2301

以下是引用shenyang在2007-1-15 11:56:00的发言：

不好意思死脑筋，还是不明白，GG解释说不过这个原因会lead to另一个结果:number of articles变多而非减少那不是正说明the low number of articles 不是 due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators吗？是我太转牛角尖了么，知道答案是E，可是还是转不过这个弯来，好像天生没有逻辑思维能力

用简单的想法说好了

暂时先抛开题目选项

看一个简单的逻辑链就好:

题目的结论说是AàB

E直接说不是A,而是C造成了B

所以weaken啦

而D是说D(另一个他因)àE(另一个结果)

不能完全weaken文章的结论

因为你不会知道D可不可以造成B

有可能也说不定啊!

shenyang

谢谢，结果的不确定性，好像明白了，还需要自己在总结总结。。。

祝GG考个好成绩，为你祈祷