ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2020|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-6-Q20 help

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-12-18 17:09:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-6-Q20 help

GWD-6-Q20:

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.  Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

  1. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.

  2. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.

  3. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.

  4. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. 总量没有变

  5. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

我选的是B

不知道为什么要选D啊

就算总量没有变,也没有WEAKEN 啊,因为只有那些already had long-term savings的人 的总量没有变

不太明白

沙发
发表于 2006-12-18 23:00:00 | 只看该作者

题:政府要人存钱,设立了特殊帐户,百万进入此帐户,但政策失败,为什么?

B.因为存钱到以前的特殊帐户的人不能存钱到这里。(但是确实有百万了,所以不关他们的事,你们不能存别人可以存)

D.因为百万里面很多来自已经有的长期存款帐户的转账行为。(恩,有点道理,吸引的钱是原来银行里有的)

就题论题。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 10:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部