|
7. According to the author, "The common explanation"(line 28) of connections between economic, military,and cultural development is (A) revolutionary and too new to have been appliedto the history of the Byzantine Empire (B) reasonable, but an antiquated theory of the natureof progress (C) not applicable to the Byzantine revival as a whole,but does perhaps accurately describe limitedperiods during the revival (D) equally applicable to the Byzantine case as awhole and to the history of military, economic,and cultural advances in ancient Greece andRome (E) essentially not helpful, because military, economic,and cultural advances are part of a singlephenomenon 答案是C,我不知道从文中那里推出“accurately describe limited periods during the revival”。是文章最后一句话吗?In fact, the revival of Byzantine learning may itself have influenced the subsequent economic and military expansion. 不是特别理解这句话,是对前面的转折吗?还是对前面的支持? 请各位指点一下 |