***伤自尊了--OG11-23篇-历史学家颠覆现有历史***

飞天猪piggy

我觉得这篇文章的不难读懂 但是读完后逻辑极其混乱 题目也出的十分tricky

请看完之后思路依然清晰的nn指点一二~~~

129. The "new pasts" mentioned in line 6 can best be described as the

(A)         occurrence of events extremely similar to past events

(B)         history of the activities of studying, interpreting, and reading new historical writing

(C)        change in people's understanding of the past due to more recent historical writing(C)

(D)        overturning of established historical interpretations by politically motivated politicians

(E)         difficulty of predicting when a given historical interpretation will be overturned

看到mentioned第一反应就是回原文找答案 于是找到了最接近的B(Historians sometimes forget thiat history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read. These latter activities have their own history, of course, which may impinge in unexpected ways on public events. It is difficult to predict when "new pasts" will overturn established historical interpretations and change the course of history.)

看了OG的解释才知道此题需要联系下文所说的例子理解意思才能得出答案，是道inference题

但还是不知道排除B的理由。

还有132题：

132. The passage suggests that C. Vann Woodward and Thomas Paine were similar in all of the following ways EXCEPT

(A)            both had works published in the midst of important historical events

(B)            both wrote works that enjoyed widespread popularity

(C)           both exhibited an understanding of the relevance of historical evidence to contemporary issues

(D)           the works of both had a significant effect on events following their publication

(E)            both were able to set aside worries about historical anachronism in order to reach and inspire

OG给出的解释是：Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism.然后说Woodward是historian,so he worried about anachronism个人觉得这个解题的逻辑也有点问题啊。。。

OG给出的解释是：Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian, and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism.然后说Woodward是historian,so he worried about anachronism个人觉得这个解题的逻辑也有点问题啊。。。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-15 21:12:09编辑过]

飞天猪piggy

看了以前的讨论 还是不明白

T上去~~~

天天灿烂

129：These latter activities have their own history这里比较容易混淆。这个own history不是指研究等行为自己的发展过程，而是指基于这些研究等行为而被人重新理解的历史。硬翻的话就是“（基于）这些行为，产生了一种新的历史。”这样想的确比较奇怪。但是这的确就是OG想说的吧。这样想的话B自然就被排除而选C了。

132：P不是史学家，不care年代，这文章里有，不难理解。W是史学家，这点也清楚吧。问题就是W care年代的出处：文中说W在自己书的第二版里面讽刺的道歉就是因为顾及了年代问题。在1776年美国大革命刚刚开始的时候就给整个革命下了评价，也就是说W意识到了自己的著作在年代上有问题，结论下得过早。

一家之言，希望有帮助。：）

p.s. 我也是上海的，2月份考。目标分数跟lz差不多。有msn么？

sm0421

我也是上海的，1月考，也是这个目标.....

sm0421

这篇文章我也没读懂，不过做对了一个。

129，整篇文章我感觉就是指时代变化让人们重新认识历史，那么new past, 新的过去，就是说变化重新认识过去，就选C了。

132，选不出来啊，后来选C了，答案的解释就是让我们找文中最明显的证据，郁闷。

ypngzhang

以下是引用天天灿烂在2006-12-18 21:47:00的发言：

129：These latter activities have their own history这里比较容易混淆。这个own history不是指研究等行为自己的发展过程，而是指基于这些研究等行为而被人重新理解的历史。硬翻的话就是“（基于）这些行为，产生了一种新的历史。”这样想的确比较奇怪。但是这的确就是OG想说的吧。这样想的话B自然就被排除而选C了。

132：P不是史学家，不care年代，这文章里有，不难理解。W是史学家，这点也清楚吧。问题就是W care年代的出处：文中说W在自己书的第二版里面讽刺的道歉就是因为顾及了年代问题。在1776年美国大革命刚刚开始的时候就给整个革命下了评价，也就是说W意识到了自己的著作在年代上有问题，结论下得过早。

一家之言，希望有帮助。：）

p.s. 我也是上海的，2月份考。目标分数跟lz差不多。有msn么？

天天灿灿，能看出来，你对这篇文章理解的比较透彻。我感觉这篇文章好难。

我也在上海，2月份考。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-19 11:13:57编辑过]

飞天猪piggy

以下是引用天天灿烂在2006-12-18 21:47:00的发言：

129：These latter activities have their own history这里比较容易混淆。这个own history不是指研究等行为自己的发展过程，而是指基于这些研究等行为而被人重新理解的历史。硬翻的话就是“（基于）这些行为，产生了一种新的历史。”这样想的确比较奇怪。但是这的确就是OG想说的吧。这样想的话B自然就被排除而选C了。

132：P不是史学家，不care年代，这文章里有，不难理解。W是史学家，这点也清楚吧。问题就是W care年代的出处：文中说W在自己书的第二版里面讽刺的道歉就是因为顾及了年代问题。在1776年美国大革命刚刚开始的时候就给整个革命下了评价，也就是说W意识到了自己的著作在年代上有问题，结论下得过早。

一家之言，希望有帮助。：）

p.s. 我也是上海的，2月份考。目标分数跟lz差不多。有msn么？

ＰＦ　天天兄的分析很清楚～

看来做文史类的文章得更注重对文章的总体把握　而不是仅仅停留在字面上啊

springsound

顶上来。想再讨论一下１２９题：

原文中：Historians sometimes forget thiat history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read. These latter activities have their own history, of course, which may impinge in unexpected ways on public events. It is difficult to predict when "new pasts" will overturn established historical interpretations and change the course of history.

这里的these latter activities究竟指代的是哪些活动？是it is studied, interpreted, and read，还是history is continually being ... experienced ?

还是不明白为什么排除Ｂ项……

nedelon

Historians sometimes forget that history is continually being made and experienced before it is studied, interpreted, and read.[TS or phenomenon] These latter activities have their own history, of course, which (5) may [情态动词，判断句]impinge in unexpected ways on public events.It is difficult to predict when “new pasts” [注意引号，强调=latter activities] will overturn established historical interpretations and change the course of history. [will=may, V1/V2=impinge]
     

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-31 22:27:11编辑过]

dustinxing

OG11－23是唯一一篇我看的稀里糊涂的文章（OG11黄皮共24篇）。

就129题，发表一下个人观点。

我首先是用了排除法，把A,D,E直接排除了（有关无关法则）。只剩下B,C:

(B)   history of the activities of studying, interpreting, and reading new historical writing

(C)   change in people's understanding of the past due to more recent historical writing

选项（B）的中心词是history，选项（C）的中心词是change。问题：The "new pasts" mentioned in line 6 can best be described as the，那么我理解为可以替代，把选项（B）\(C)的中心词代替“new pasts”，从语意来看，我选择了（C）。

我做此题，技巧多于理解（其实不是每篇文章都要搞懂的，当然能搞懂最好），呵呵。