[求助]GWD30-36 11/28要考了 麻烦大家帮忙看一下

ilffforever

(The following was excerpted from material written in 1988.)

      For over a decade the

        most common policy advice

        given to developing countries

Line
                    by international development

  (5)        institutions has been to copy

the export-oriented path of the

newly industrializing countries,

the celebrated NIC’s.  These

economies—Brazil, Hong

 (10)        Kong, Mexico, Singapore,

South Korea, and Taiwan—

burst into the world manufac-

turing market in the late 1960’s

and the 1970’s; by 1978 these

 (15)        six economies, along with India,

enjoyed unequaled growth

rates for gross national product

and for exports, with exports

accounting for 70 percent of

 (20)        the developing world’s manu-

        factured exports.  It was,

        therefore, not surprising that

dozens of other countries

attempted to follow their model,

 (25)        yet no countries—with the pos-

sible exceptions of Malaysia

and Thailand—have even

approached their success.  In

“No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad

 (30)        and John Cavanagh search for

the reasons behind these fail-

ures, identifying far-reaching

        changes in the global econ-

omy—from synthetic substitutes

 (35)
                         for commodity exports to

unsustainable levels of foreign

debt—as responsible for a glut

economy offering little room for

       new entrants.  Despite these

 (40)       changes, the authors maintain,

the World Bank and the Inter-

national Monetary Fund—the

foremost international devel-

opment institutions—have

 (45)        continued to promote the NIC

path as the way for heavily

indebted developing countries

to proceed.  And yet the futility

of this approach should,

 (50)        according to the authors, be

all too apparent so many years

into a period of reduced growth

in world markets.

Q36:

The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?

               

1. The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
2. The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
3. The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
4. The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
5. The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy

请问这题的文章对应位置在哪  我胡乱选了个C 
另外下面这句话(Line34~Line37)是在说什麽?

from synthetic substitutes for commodity exports to unsustainable levels of foreign debt
麻烦大家帮忙一下  谢谢

seraphh

一点拙见，不知当否：

1、40行开始到最后；

2、是说那些没有成功转型的发展中国家之所以失败的原因：从出口商品的综合替代品到这些国家的不可维持的外债水平。

sigrid920

这是本月JJ吗?

ilffforever

以下是引用seraphh在2006-11-26 2:17:00的发言：

一点拙见，不知当否：

1、40行开始到最后；

2、是说那些没有成功转型的发展中国家之所以失败的原因：从出口商品的综合替代品到这些国家的不可维持的外债水平。

了解了 
謝謝熱心的seraphh 感激不盡阿

to sigrid920 mm
好像不是

seraphh

不用客气，互相帮助。

mimixiaxia

up

qincong83

Despite these
            changes, the authors maintain,
            the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund—the
            foremost international development institutions—have
            continued to promote the NIC
                path as the way for heavily
            indebted developing countries
            to proceed.
                

WB和IMF仍旧在给高强度外债的发展中国家使用NIC path，（代表上面两个人是不认同这种做法的）

【总结】题目问这两个人不同意WB和IMF的哪个做法？注意但这里需要对NIC path进行一个前文的回找。文章一开头就说了“copy
                        the
                        export-oriented path of”即NIC path是以出口为导向的做法。所以这两个人反对WB和IMF在于：继续对高外债发展中国家使用export-oriented path. 而C迷惑选项，“发展中国家应该维持外债水平”只是字面上很像，没有深入到他们反对的重点（NIC path）

NOTALOSER

楼上分析的不错，赞

jackieli007

~~