以下是引用KATIEUS在2006-11-20 23:42:00的发言：I think this passage focus on the factors that lead to venture capitalist successful, to confirm whether this success belongs to the source of finance or belongs to the personal characteristics. I agree with the key, but do not agree with the explanation about A, because I think the responsiveness also belongs to the personal characteristics. Have you agreed with me? Some suggestions are welcome. NO. Maybe you got some misunderstood about this question.In my mind ,this arg is telling us what is more important to strat-companies not to venture capitalist.LZ just reread the arg once again. Surcing of finance is more imporatant than characteristics of entrepreneur ,the quality of strategic planning, or the management structure of the company. A is saying that venture capitalists who provided start-up companies with Surcing of finance division are more responsive.And then A is support the conclusion that Surcing of finance is very important for sure. Here we have two parallelism subjects,start-up companies vs venture capitalists.A is saying that the responsiveness of venture capitalists to stand out that surcing of finance which provided by venture capitalists is so good that it is very important to start-up companies whose entrepreneurs have characteristics that has never been identified by ETS in this question any more.So do not put too much your own opinion into the question and obey to the information listed above.In choice A ,if ture,venture capitalists tend to be more responsive means responsiveness of the venture capitalists who offer the sourcing of finance to start-up companies is get into increasing.That's the relationship between venture capitalists who offer and other factors such as characteristics of entreprenuer who has the start-up companies ,quality and management in this question. We know nothing about the characteristics unless ETS tells us what it is.As we have seen,in this question,resonsiveness is being used to modify venture capitalists not entreprenuer.When the subjects are different ,there will be another story.A is supporting the conclusion anyway.Just reread it one time again. Hopes that will do you a favour.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-11-21 9:51:34编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
楼主
发表于 2006-11-21 01:33:00
