ChaseDream
搜索
123
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 2006gmat2006
打印 上一主题 下一主题

公共政策和劳动力市场对妇女产假的影响

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-11-11 15:41:00 | 只看该作者

I vote D, In B, had an initial impact (maternity-leave already exists before EEOC)

 

 As early as 1973, a

survey found that 58 percent of large

 (25)      employers had responded with new

maternity-leave policies.

毫无疑问maternity-leave already exists before EEOC,但在EEOC之后,对于new

maternity-leave policies.有58%的老板有回应呀,这里有个new

maternity-leave policies.有58%的老板有回应呀,这里有个new

ETS题目考的确实很卑鄙!

另外,经过讨论大家对第一体选C应该都没有意见,如果没有an initial impact,第一题中的C就没有意义了It is possible for a particular government policy to continue to have an impact after that policy has been eliminated.(政策消除之后继续有影响)说明开始还是有影响的

22#
发表于 2006-11-12 00:48:00 | 只看该作者
the survey only used by the author to argue the effects of public policy(not used by politicans). The politicians discount the role, argue that program already exists prior FMLA. They overlook, so implies that they may not agree with the initial impact. If you can prove D is wrong, then B is the correct answer. In D, Motivations, voluntary vs government mandates.
23#
发表于 2006-11-12 11:47:00 | 只看该作者

In D, Motivations, voluntary vs government mandates.

有道理,经过仔细读了3遍,觉得D对,现在倒戈了!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-22 14:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部