ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sbbi
打印 上一主题 下一主题

885 sec 3-24

[精华] [复制链接]
31#
发表于 2005-10-12 05:20:00 | 只看该作者

thanks a lot

32#
发表于 2005-10-14 19:14:00 | 只看该作者

另有一个疑问,Is it logical that compare a civilization with a city?


a civilization有文明社会,文明国家,还有都市的意思吧

33#
发表于 2005-11-17 21:35:00 | 只看该作者

yup, one of the explainations of "civilization" in the Longman DICT is: a place such as a city where you feel comfortable, especially because it is modern.
e.g. After a week in the mountains all I wanted to do was get back to civilization.


I was also wondering whether it is logical to campare the civilization with the city, but it will be no prob if "civilization" means "city" here.



34#
发表于 2006-3-22 21:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用bluestone1在2003-12-16 10:32:00的发言:
最根本的原则是:无歧义就能省就省;有歧义则该补就补

1、I am taller than he (is).    要省略(主句无宾语,主语比较很明确)

2、China has more people than Canada has.       要补,以明确 Canada 不是与 people 比

3、885 sec 3-24
   a civilization (a thousand years more ancient than the city ).
   括号部分作定语修饰 a civilization
   定语从句结构为  a civilization was a thousand years more ancient than the city --情况同 1

4、170中 making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it was five years ago 是伴随状语
     结构是 a large rise makes the economic health more robust than it was five years ago.
     more rebust 是宾补, 加上 it was 更明确表明比较对象是 economic health 而不是 a rise

此规律太难掌握,唉!难 ...

那么可以不可以概括为,主系表结构的,可以省略代词+be;实义动词的,不能省略

请指正

35#
发表于 2006-4-26 17:34:00 | 只看该作者
好像明白点点了,唉,自己总结一下再来看看
36#
发表于 2006-4-28 15:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chipmunk在2003-10-20 9:26:00的发言:
It will be better if you could list two parts of the comparison. One part is: civilization, so the counterpart should be a noun, not a sentence.

Nice shot!
Very clear explanation!

Thanks,
Demon Hunter

37#
发表于 2006-4-28 15:27:00 | 只看该作者

After finished all the discussion, totally confused...

Let's Fight,
Demon Hunter

38#
发表于 2006-5-4 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

太好了! 对于主谓宾结构的句子比较时,要补全动词

39#
发表于 2006-5-29 23:22:00 | 只看该作者

making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it was five years ago 是两种不同状况的比较,即,rise make health more robust和 health was robost five years ago之间的比较,如果不加it was, 一种理解歧义就是: rise make health more robust 和 rise made hearth five years ago之间的比较,含义不同。

40#
发表于 2006-6-20 20:46:00 | 只看该作者

170. A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars, making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago.
(A) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(B) and make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(C) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it was five years ago
(D) to make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(E) in making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it as five years ago
ANSWER C

这道题比较的是明年的construction industry’s economic health和五年前的construction industry’s economic health,把省略补全了即为:making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than the construction industry’s economic health was five years ago.而A.B.D中的five years ago没有比较对象。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 00:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部