[原创]10-21 北美考场经历 少量JJ （添加新回忆起2题）

ecochem

我是10月21号考的，上午8点，7点半就等着check－in了，其他都是美国人，有考GMAT，也有什么college exam。

早上没吃什么，就3块mini size的德芙，没带水，从来没试过红牛

先进去领一个号码牌，然后每人一张考场纪律，等着叫到号，就拍照，按指纹，签名。再将东西放入一个小储物箱，不能带手表，手镯之类的。

然后再进一个房间，有个老太太再交代一点纪律，又按指纹验证，然后给了一本noteboard，2支水笔，她告诉我不要将笔帽一直打开，笔会干。然后就是问我要不要ear plug，我觉得ear plug很管用，因为后来考试别人进进出出，我也没怎么受影响。她把我领进第三个房间，都是一个一个电脑格子间。就开始考试啦

很羡慕那些能把题目记住的NN，但是我实在记忆力很差，就记起一点点，大家多多包涵。

AWA

Argument是一篇shampoo公司，HR2有没有危害那一篇 应该＃70

Issue好像是＃45，"the most effective way for a businessperson to maximize profits over a long period of time is to follow the highest standards of ethics"

我只看了不到15道argu，不到20道issue，所以题目不太清楚，请double check

MATH

n不等于0， 问nx>ny?

(1) n² x>n²y

(2) x>y

我选了E

VERB

我的verb做的很烂，老是出现语法，逻辑倒是不多，

我觉得是进入低分区的缘故，sigh，做到后来都随便选了

而且我居然出现5篇阅读，太郁闷了

一篇是说混沌（chaos）的研究历史，

一篇讲为什么pottery技术很早被某地妇女（好像是印第安妇女）掌握了，但是为什么在introduction of agriculture以后n年，才开始制作陶器。解释这个时间lag

逻辑有一道是GWD中某题，好像是问assumption，问某条河流污染使鱼减少，但是现在铺oil pipe不会oil leak，所以不会影响鱼类

哎呀，其他我实在记不起来了，太惭愧了
  

等这两天有回忆起来，再贡献给大家

从CD我学到很多，谢谢CD，并祝各位考试顺利！

想起来了2道

一篇阅读就是说建筑师设计房子从审美角度，客户从使用角度，2者冲突，如何解决

一道数学是教授有7个students，3个projects，A project分配2个学生，B project分配3个，C分配2个，问共有几种分配方式

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-23 10:41:00编辑过]

ondesert

怎么会有5篇阅读??

linda816

是不是真正考试的时候instruction也要算实际时间的阿？记得prep上面说是算得，那的确要快速跳过了。。。

请问考场提供的ear plug是耳塞还是大的耳机啊？

ecochem

ear plug是耳塞

电脑旁边也有大的耳机

ecochem

以下是引用ondesert在2006-10-23 6:26:00的发言：
怎么会有5篇阅读??

也有可能是我考的昏头

不会数数了

super_pig

感谢分享~~

Cantaloupe

感谢楼主分享！

specters

以下是引用ecochem在2006-10-23 6:47:00的发言：

也有可能是我考的昏头

不会数数了

kevin5

谢谢LZ。

那道CR

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TT28-Q9:

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

 

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

 

1. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.
2. Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.
3. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa.
4. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.
5. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

   Answer: B

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

sinoversion

thx