ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rainman714
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一点10.11.JJ

[精华] [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-10-11 21:43:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主!你真是个认真负责的人:)
12#
发表于 2006-10-11 21:55:00 | 只看该作者

thanks a lot .if i can reach the score like u i will feel happy ...

13#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-11 22:19:00 | 只看该作者
不谢  愿大家好运.
14#
发表于 2006-10-11 22:36:00 | 只看该作者

6.问两条平行的线 上面5个点 下面那条4个点问多少个三角形可以连.  答案是40吧 如果没记错.

答案应该是70吧

C9,3-C5,3-C4,3或者C5,1*C4,2+C5,2*C4,1

15#
发表于 2006-10-11 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

LZ能否帮忙看一下是否类似下面这篇,我google下来的

This vigilance behaviour allows animals to improve their chances of detecting a predator. Because vigilance conflicts with other activities, animals must decide how to divide their time between those conflicting demands. Vigilance has become a central topic in behavioural ecology, providing a model system for investigating behavioural adaptation.

Many animals are gregarious and the reasons for, and consequences of, this behaviour continue to be the focus of considerable interest. It has been hypothesized that grouping should affect the balance between vigilance and other activities. Assuming that individuals scan independently and that the probability of at least one group member detecting a predator stays constant with increasing group size, individual vigilance rate should decline with increasing group size.

Such a relationship has been reported in species ranging from ostriches to parrots and kangaroos to wildebeeste. However, a common problem is to determine whether a correlation implies a causative effect. Variables which might confound a relationship between group size and vigilance include competition for food: if there is more competition in larger groups, a reduction in vigilance in larger groups may be a consequence of this rather than group size per se. The problem then is to provide a convincing demonstration of a direct effect of group size on vigilance.

16#
发表于 2006-10-11 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
搂住好恩啊!·
17#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-12 03:20:00 | 只看该作者
15楼的朋友  我觉得很类似但是有些不一样
18#
发表于 2006-10-12 18:05:00 | 只看该作者
3.W为员工总数,把员工分3组,然后会多出一个人来,问下面3组可能是各组员工人数选项的  答案好象是W-1/3,W-1/3,W+2/3. 这题是什么意思啊
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-12 18:05:21编辑过]
19#
发表于 2006-10-14 05:04:00 | 只看该作者

W-1/3,W-1/3,W+2/3  

i feel that this answer is incorrect

if W-1/3,W-1/3,W+2/3  is answer

where is {多出一个人}

20#
发表于 2006-10-14 10:33:00 | 只看该作者

对阿,应该选三组人数相加为W-1的选项吧,以上选项中,(w-1/3)+(w-1/3)+(w+2/3)=w, 不对的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-25 03:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部