ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1410|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教各位高手GWD-17-9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-10 21:43:00 | 只看该作者

请教各位高手GWD-17-9

这题为什么选B?

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects

Q9:canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

  1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
  2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
  3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
  4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
  5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

   Answer: B

沙发
发表于 2006-10-10 21:50:00 | 只看该作者

这题我印象很深,今天考试刚好也遇到了,选B

因为写评估报告的人是中立的,那么问题只能出在总统身上,你按住NOT不看,就是说“大多数被评估为浪费的项目都在执政党控制的州”

大多数被评估为浪费的项目都在执政党控制的州 + 大多数被取消的项目都在反对党所在的州---->总统偏心

也就是取非削弱,这题应该用FF说的解题方法:按住NOT削弱


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-10 22:11:16编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-10 22:11:00 | 只看该作者

现在用取非削弱明白了,还要区分浪费和取消的项目是两回事。

这题思路很特别,要好好琢磨一下。

谢谢benny_style的指点!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部