[讨论]gwd25-21未讨论过

davidli8888

I doubt choice C. The key for the argument is to know what gives rise to the dropping in the demonstration , but that has nothing to do with the stand on the opposition party's position. Judging the each choice, E stands out.

The decline in the unemployment gives rise to the support for the government, leading to the dropping in the demonstration. But the dropping has nothing to do with a re-election.

However C needs us to make one more assumption -state-controlled media coverage of the demonstration is an important factor to drawing people to participate the demonstration. In this sense, C besides the point.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-23 21:46:56编辑过]

l980053

瞎掰的题，根本没答案

bluevivi001

明白了！ 多谢！

lb1900

ding

colorful_na

c

瞳色九月

还是不是很懂啊。。。

E为什么对啊？

觉得是削弱啊。

罗马青年

up

andrakan

up

wsdoll

?????????????????????????up

sch

E也不是消弱.
E根本就是无关.
支持政府的人数上升,和"不能说明支持反对党人数下降"根本没有必然关系.

本题目是说,参加示威的人数少了,但是不能因此说明反对党不受欢迎了,要求解释.C是说首都以外的人不知道游行还进行呢,所以参加的人越来越少了.他因解释了,不是因为不受欢迎了而人数少.

E,支持政府的人多了,不能必然解释支持反对党的少了.