GWD31-Q10 搜过没有

allen0018

    

The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C.

    

Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they
were Canaanites.

    

In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that
excavations of Avans,

    

The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have
uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually

    

Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon
was a majkor city of

    

Canaan at the
time of the Hyksos’ invasion.

    

 

    

In order to evaluate the force of the
archaeologists. Evidence ,it would

    

Useful to determine which of the following ?

    

 

    

1)     
whether artifacts from Ashkelon
were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities

    

2)     
Whether significant numbers of
artifacts that do not resemble artifacts

    

produced in Ashkelon
have been found at Avaris

    

3)     
Whether Avaris was the nearest
Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan

    

4)     
Whether Ashkelon
after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose

    

found at Avaris

    

5)     
whether any artifacts produced
by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been

    

found in Egypt
        

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-14 14:05:02编辑过]

wycg

看不太清楚,lz重贴一下.

AlienX

我也不太會.
我選B.
我覺得A跟B都可以.
我不明白為什麼B不對.
有人可以解釋一下嗎???

jesuischong

我也觉得A可以呀.....

The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.

In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists’ evidence, it would useful to determine which of the following?

A.          Whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities?

B.           Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avans?

C.          Whether Avans was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan?

D.          Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avans?

E.           Whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been found in Egypt

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-14 3:29:14编辑过]

pony1208

同意A : Whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities?

如果artifacts from Ashkelon
        没有traded出去，则表示artifacts就是invasion那段时间带过去Egypt的。则可以确定The Hyksos的origin就是Ashkelon。

如果artifacts from Ashkelon
        有widely traded，则表示artifacts可能是traded过去Egypt。则无法确定The Hyksos的origin。

Princika

B无关 如果在Avans发现 有可能C占领了Ashkelon 和Acans这两个城市

      如果在Avans没发现 可能C占领了 Ashkelon 

不能回答题目

hyl_0212

up!!
我还是觉得AB都对
有没有人再来解释一下为什么B不对？还是不理解

shayla_wu

B选项无关
本文只讨论与avan所生产的一样的artifacts
what's at issue is artifacts identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon

jesmine

为什么D不可以吖？
要是在埃及发现了artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C，那不就说明The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta of Egypt 了吗？？？
请求大家帮我指点下好不？？？

shayla_wu

D.    Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avans?

对该问题的回答是yes:对原文结论无影响；
如果回答是no：1550bc后不再生产那种器物，也有可能是hy将1550之前生产的器物带入了avans，原文结论依然成立