Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument? - The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far
superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores. - Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests
than those built before 1930. - The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were
not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930. - The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the
less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
- The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has
declined significantly since 1930.答案是d,可我怎么觉得是加强或无关呢?大家怎么看?
|