- UID
- 7564
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-7-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
TO aeroplane :!!!
lsat 1-4:if the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? to dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature. assumption:(c) digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature. 题干那句话我还是读不懂to what end are all the arts of life?到底是什么意思,我认为是做这道题的关键。查了字典,end可能与本题相关的解释有三种:1)something toward which one strives; a goal.目的朝着一个事物努力;目标see: intention2)a result; an outcome.结果;后果3)the ultimate extent; the very limit:极限;最大限度:the end of one's patience.耐心的极限。我觉得用哪个解释都不太明确原句的本意,可能是因为它是个省略后的问句的关系吧,各位大牛版主们,谁能具体的解释下end这个词和这句话呢?
这道题的意思是: 如果说人工不如自然,那么艺术(艺术 就是人工创造 )还有什么意义?!to dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes(这些都是ARTS OF LIFE)都是对自然的破坏。那么既然这些都是对自然的破坏,岂不都没有意义了? 假设就是作者 认为to dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes比自然好。因为作者认为它们实际上都 是有意义 的 。 |
|