ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 18598|回复: 27
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-16-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-11 19:53:00 | 只看该作者

大全-16-16

16. The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstores” whose high sales volume keeps their prices low. This analysis is flawed, however, since even today the superstores control a very small share of the retail market.

   Which of the following, if true, would most weaken
   the argument that the analysis is flawed?
   (A) Most of the larger customers for office
       equipment purchase under contract directly
       from manufacturers and thus do not participate
       in the retail market.
   (B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low
       prices has forced prices down throughout the
       retail market for office supplies.
   (C) Some of the superstores that only recently
       opened have themselves gone out of business.
   (D) Most of the office equipment superstores are
       owned by large retailing chains that also own
       stores selling other types of goods.
   (E) The growing importance of computers in most
       offices has changed the kind of office
       equipment retailers must stock.
这道题的答案是B,但是我觉得B并没有反对the argument that the analysis is flawed。
只是加强了前半部分的论述。但是其他的选项应该也都不对。请指教阿

沙发
发表于 2003-10-12 01:16:00 | 只看该作者
Hi, you can look at the one jdxf posted at 10/10 "两个逻辑题目,新东方的。请指教", there are answers in it.
板凳
发表于 2005-8-6 17:25:00 | 只看该作者

why choose B? I chose A.

地板
发表于 2005-8-7 00:01:00 | 只看该作者
他因.
5#
发表于 2005-8-11 19:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用bejiao在2003-10-11 19:53:00的发言:
16. The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstores” whose high sales volume keeps their prices low. This analysis is flawed, however, since even today the superstores control a very small share of the retail market.

   Which of the following, if true, would most weaken
   the argument that the analysis is flawed?
   (A) Most of the larger customers for office
       equipment purchase under contract directly
       from manufacturers and thus do not participate
       in the retail market.
   (B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low
       prices has forced prices down throughout the
       retail market for office supplies.这道题的答案是B,但是我觉得B并没有反对the argument that the analysis is flawed。
只是加强了前半部分的论述。但是其他的选项应该也都不对。请指教阿


想再請教各位MM,為何A不行??我覺得A是他因導致analysis flaw的論述結果,那不就是weaken了analysis flaw了嗎??為何不對?謝謝.

6#
发表于 2005-8-11 19:55:00 | 只看该作者

analysis是如何分析many small firms have gone out of business的呢?是price;price怎么了呢?the advent of superstores导致了price low,这其中突出了“以价格为武器”的概念。


把问题转换一下,就是support that the analysis is right;A有理,但不是原题里面的理;B中体现了原题的思路。

7#
发表于 2005-8-12 14:30:00 | 只看该作者

补充一句,A 选项没说是买superstore时才directly from manufacturers 而是说买office equipment 那岂不是说不管买的是哪种equipment都直接从厂家买,大家都一样了,自然市场份额不会变化太大,所以没有起到削弱作用。


看来要认真读选项呀


我也做错了

8#
发表于 2005-8-12 15:02:00 | 只看该作者
顺着这道题的思路,A应该是无关选项
9#
发表于 2005-8-12 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

我常犯這種毛病...想請教是否有這種做題技巧??當文章分前後轉折.前面論述而後面反對,題目問削弱後者時,我是不是可以不管後面反對的內容,直接去找支持前面論述的答案就好了呢??謝謝!!

10#
发表于 2006-4-6 08:56:00 | 只看该作者
我也绕进去了.不懂.求解答.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 07:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部