求教一道关于选举规则的逻辑难题,请各位大侠帮忙

keledong

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D)The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

nickynicky

我选E
只要有一个以上nominee,这个nomination就是不可能实现的，因为事先不能知道有哪些nomination,而nominee的consent有一定要被告知有哪些其他的nominee..

cranberry

对，只有E，因为既然所涉及的每个人作出结论的前提是知道别人的结论，这个逻辑就循环了，所以一定是不可能成立的。