大全-7-16(看了以前的讨论贴,还是不明白)

judiwind2006

16. The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills. In fact, the quotas will help “mini-mills” flourish in the United States. Those small domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills than would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the claim made in the last sentence above?

(A) Quality rather than price is a major factor in determining the type of steel to be used for a particular application.

(B) Foreign steel mills have long produced grades of steel comparable in quality to the steel produced by the big American mills.

(C) American quotas on imported goods have often induced other countries to impose similar quotas on American goods.

(D) Domestic “mini-mills” consistently produce better grades of steel than do the big American mills.

(E) Domestic “mini-mills” produce low-volume, specialized types of steels that are not produced by the big American steel mills.

Why the answer is E. If E is OK, I feel D also OK. 无非说明小公司大公司产品定位不一样罢了,为啥E行D不行呢?  

应该是本来有三方在竞争, 大公司,小公司和外国公司,现在有进口限制了,应该大小公司抢原来外国公司的市场份额.  最后那句话的意思是: 小公司会从大公司手里抢到比原先外国公司从大公司手里抢走的份额更多的份额.  问怎样削弱?                       太搞了,我都晕了.  有哪位高人可以指点一二?

gonghao

题目说：加上配额不好，因为小工厂会从大工厂手上抢走更多的份额，比之国外的厂商

问weaken

E说：小工厂生产的东西，大工厂不生产，即小工厂不会抢份额

D：小工厂生产的比大工厂的质量好。反而加强了结论。的确会抢份额

judiwind2006

谢谢gonghao.我理解了.

可是我还有点疑问: 如果大小工厂生产产品不同,则实行进口配额后,原来由外国公司所占的大公司份额必定还是有大工厂夺回啊? 那为何原文又说实行进口配额没有帮到大工厂,应该有帮到的吧?

另外,我还是觉得有点搞,你可不可以帮我理理这道题的原文line of reasoning? 哪部分是前提? 哪部分是结论? 削弱题应该是削弱结论的吧,我怎么觉着原文前两句话象结论,而最后一句话(题目让我们削弱的)反而象前提呢?

judiwind2006

是不是我的问题太stupid,都没人要理我了?

ygyao

那不正是从答案e中推出的结论,其刚好与题干中的相反呀.那是我们需要的.

gonghao

以下是引用judiwind2006在2006-8-23 11:40:00的发言：

谢谢gonghao.我理解了.

可是我还有点疑问: 如果大小工厂生产产品不同,则实行进口配额后,原来由外国公司所占的大公司份额必定还是有大工厂夺回啊? 那为何原文又说实行进口配额没有帮到大工厂,应该有帮到的吧?

原文说：没有帮到大工厂是因为，加上配额的本意是要使得大工厂的份额增加，但是argument觉的小工厂会来抢份额，比国外厂商还厉害。所以觉的没有达到使得“大工厂的份额增加”这个目的。

现在如果如E所说，作者的担心就显的多余了，因为小工厂生产的产品和大工厂不同，配额是好的，的确是会帮到的。

另外,我还是觉得有点搞,你可不可以帮我理理这道题的原文line of reasoning? 哪部分是前提? 哪部分是结论? 削弱题应该是削弱结论的吧,我怎么觉着原文前两句话象结论,而最后一句话(题目让我们削弱的)反而象前提呢?

结论：The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills. 结论一般是一个推测性的东西。后面是说推出这个结论的原因。E：weaken了这个原因。

line is：mall domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills  would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas－－－》the quotas will help “mini-mills” flourish in the United States－－－》The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills

emiliejiang

gonghao 发表于 2006-8-22 17:33
题目说：加上配额不好，因为小工厂会从大工厂手上抢走更多的份额，比之国外的厂商问weakenE说：小工厂生产 ...

but here we say, small mills produce different types of products, but we do not say they only produce different things. What about if they produce tha same things as the big mills at the same time?