ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1723|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

讨论天山T-9-25,,JJ题目\选项不变,但黑体字内容变了.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-18 01:04:00 | 只看该作者

讨论天山T-9-25,,JJ题目\选项不变,但黑体字内容变了.

讨论天山JJ,题目选\项目不变,但黑体字内容变了.

天山原题,

.  jj作者语:题干是一样的,但粗体部分变了,选项也变了,不过只要搞清楚那两句话的关系以及作者态度就没问题。选项是天山的原题,不适用于粗体部分,具体大家自己比较。原来题目Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, a study has found that almost all scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their fields late and less than a dozen years before their creative breakthroughs. Since creative breakthroughs by scientists under forty also generally occur within a dozen years of the scientists’ entry into the field, the study’s finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not due to age but rather because most have spent too long in their fields.

 

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first is the position that the argument as a whole depends; the second is evidence that is advanced as part of that evidence.

  2. The first and second are both claims that have been advanced in support of a position that the argument as a whole opposes.

  3. The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second provides evidence in support of a competing explanation that the argument defends.

  4. The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is evidence that has been used against an alternative explanation that the argument defends.

  5. The first is an explanation that the argument defends; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge that explanation.

新划线新题

Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, a study has found that almost all scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their fields late and less than a dozen years before their creative breakthroughs. Since creative breakthroughs by scientists under forty also generally occur within a dozen years of the scientists’ entry into the field, the study’s finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not due to age but rather because most have spent too long in their fields.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

沙发
发表于 2006-8-22 00:11:00 | 只看该作者

第一个要challege的conclusion,第二是author要support的conlusion

大家指教

板凳
发表于 2006-8-22 09:53:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-26 01:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部