一直有個困惑 希望大牛們能幫我分析一下 不知在一般的CR中.. premise和assumption的差別在那兒? 看mindfree大牛的心經中提到: premise用來支持sub-conclusion, assumption用來支持final conclusion 而sub-conclusion是用來服務final conclusion的 這是指用出現的位置或邏輯關係來判斷嗎? 每篇文章中都會有這些元素嗎? 如果以OG10th-12為例 12. The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services(premise A), and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise.(premise B) /Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements(C1), overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions(C2).(fianl conclusion)
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs? A. The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services. B. The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services. C. Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise. D. Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required. E. Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise. 答案E 我是這樣推的 不知降分析是否合理? 前提A+前提B-->結論C(C1-->C2) weaken是用final conclusion中充分條件(C1)成立 必要條件(C2)可以不成立 那這題裡面就不會出現assumption和sub-conclusion了嗎? 想請大家幫忙解惑一下 謝謝~~ |