Sailing to success(快乐备考,携手同行)

XVVjing61

哈哈，楼上说了一点点废话

现在说正体：

Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources

是个逻辑题的题干，做对了，但是加粗黑体部分没明白，借妹妹帮忙给翻译一下吧，谢谢了

大全15-10      

If the county continues to collect residential trash at current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing and parkland will need to be used in order to create more space. Charging each household a fee for each pound of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge will therefore protect the remaining county parkland.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they put out for collection by reducing the number of products they buy.

(B) The collection fee will not significantly affect the purchasing power of most residents, even if their households do not reduce the amount of trash they put out.

(C) The collection fee will not induce residents to dump their trash in the parklands illegally.

(D) The beauty of county parkland is an important issue for most of the county’s residents.（C）

(E) Landfills outside the county’s borders could be used as dumping sites for the county’s trash.

一点没明白， 给晶晶讲讲吧????

谢谢大家

qiuping2006fr

qiupingMM，感谢你的盛情邀请，我可能会28号下午去北京，也可能当天上午去，不一定，如果定了，就告诉你啊，到时候别不理偶啦。嘻嘻。不过偶是超级不喜欢逛街的那种怪女，除非没衣服穿了，偶一般是不会逛街滴，还有，就算逛，偶的绝大多数衣服也都是LG长眼给买滴，很惨吧。。。呀，N久没有买过新衣服了。 

In fact, I don't shopping that often too, but I like. I will wait for you in Beijing, and I promise!

LG=?? Sorry, I don't know much our Chinese expression.

fantasy06

以下是引用XVVjing61在2007-1-4 23:14:00的发言?lt;/b>

哎，移民证明材料上要我写和老公的爱情简史和心理感受，还有心理的变化

从相识-相知-相爱-结婚每一个阶段的心理变化，我的文笔实在太差了，还要用英语，我拿中文也写不出来

有人会写的吗？？ 我知道我们这里可是我虎藏龙啊？？？？

好浪漫也。羡慕晶晶ing... 我要是有这个机会一定好好写，借此在重温一下恋爱的过程，成稿后精美装桢，流传给下一代。我又开始话痨了，表打我。

饮料最是渲染氛围的好东西，冲上一杯热巧，化个水果妆，写相识的轻快和浪漫；泡功夫茶（怕麻烦就沏一玻璃杯绿茶吧），写初次相知或来电的impressive, 在由淡转浓，由浓转淡中再次的柔和，再来的清香，最后的回甘；斟上两杯红酒，穿上晚装，在烛光摇曳和音乐中（或彩色小灯泡），尽显相爱的浓郁和酒中各种flavor的重叠和诱惑；结婚---香槟，婚纱，婚戒，美食，当然是世界上最幸福，最满足的时刻了！

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-5 23:27:24编辑过]

littlecase

jojo, 丽香mm你们的建议我全收了。那我作文就不用看题库和黄金了。还好，只打印了argument 的黄金和题库, 就看到你们的建议了, issue不打了，要不我的花多少银子啊。更不用说花很多时间看了。集体的作用就是大，以后有问题应该早早请教你们。感谢啊！

 

我今天又作了一套gwd10,错了13个，超时20分钟。怎么办。阅读我总是要慢慢的读，才知道说的是什么，在规定的时间内心里一着急，什么都看不进。对于逻辑，闹闹我也有同感。我发现现在逻辑是越做越差，从第8套后就有好多看不懂了。很多题都觉得没有一个选项适合，这是就花了很多时间想，找结论，没有用啊。仍选不出来。我做了分类，但我即使是知道属于哪一类，又用什么用，方法根本没用。特别是取非，谁知道是取非哪一部分？一回是取非条件，一会是取非结论，不懂！其实还是阅读最重要。看懂了，就好办。看不懂，没戏。我是一看解释，就自圆其说，认为自己懂了。

不过，闹闹不要心迹，我相信你很快就会恢复你的斗志，继续大步向前进的。你可是我的榜样！

 

自从做gwd以来，脖子就开始痛了。以前怎么打游戏，看碟都没事。哎，一学习，身体就不适应了。在网上发现一个方法，锻炼脖子的，叫“米”字操，就是由脖子摇摇晃晃把“米”字写出来。我现在正在练习，fanfan你可以试试。

littlecase

This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource.

试着翻译了一下：

这只是表面上的观点，就和说热带雨林日益增长的砍伐率并不意味着雨林资源的缺乏一样毫无根据。

lxzjojo

以下是引用XVVjing61在2007-1-4 23:22:00的发言：

哈哈，楼上说了一点点废话

现在说正体：

Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources

是个逻辑题的题干，做对了，但是加粗黑体部分没明白，借妹妹帮忙给翻译一下吧，谢谢了

这一题偶觉得小case解释得挺好的，鼓掌~~

大全15-10      

If the county continues to collect residential trash at current levels, landfills will soon be overflowing and parkland will need to be used in order to create more space. Charging each household a fee for each pound of trash it puts out for collection will induce residents to reduce the amount of trash they create; this charge will therefore protect the remaining county parkland.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) Residents will reduce the amount of trash they put out for collection by reducing the number of products they buy.(人们会为了减少垃圾而去减少所购买的东东。题目并米有提到购买东东的多寡和垃圾数量的关系，out of scope。)

(B) The collection fee will not significantly affect the purchasing power of most residents, even if their households do not reduce the amount of trash they put out.(即使人们不去减少他们制造垃圾的数量，这个收集费还树会大大滴影响居民的购买力滴~这个一看就不顺眼，那个even if就怪得很。。。明显的无关选项。)

(C) The collection fee will not induce residents to dump their trash in the parklands illegally.(人们不会为了少交点钱就去非法滴把垃圾扔到parkland去~这里暗示了一个东东：不管要不要收费，人们要扔垃圾都只有一个方法，就是通过正常政府收集。也就是说，你要收费的话，偶要少交点钱就只能够少制造点垃圾咯~显然，答案就长得这样哈~)

(D) The beauty of county parkland is an important issue for most of the county’s residents.(对于居民来说，parkland长得美不美系一个重要滴issue。如果偶觉得这个东东重要，你不收钱偶也会去care啦，应该算是个削弱吧。。。)

(E) Landfills outside the county’s borders could be used as dumping sites for the county’s trash.(在国界以外有些垃圾处理厂可以用作处理这个国家产生的垃圾。嗯，out of scope了，原文根本米有说过!)

一点没明白， 给晶晶讲讲吧????

谢谢大家

题干：按照现在的垃圾增长速度，那些垃圾处理厂都快要不够用了，政府就得减少parkland来满足这样的增长啦~

结论：只要对每家每户收取一定的垃圾收集费用(比如说每扔一pound的垃圾你就得付多少钱)，那么人们就会自然减少制造垃圾，从而就能保护parkland啦~

假设是？(请看上面的分析)

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-5 17:13:04编辑过]

lxzjojo

哇塞，偶们的贴子可真hot，每次上来都得翻页才看得完涅~~回应一下：

闹闹：请相信自己一直在进步，CD的难度并不平均，错的题数一样并不意味着回到原点，偶敢保证，你现在看CD1一定觉得它只是纸老虎，要坚持~

晶晶的问题偶试着回答了，你看看哈~

那个。。。文笔的东东，偶觉得fanfan简直系偶偶像，她怎么写得这么好涅，太厉害鸟~简直就可以去写文艺小说了嘛~~不得不鼓掌~~晶晶快去讨教呀~

回秋萍，LG＝老公，哈~偶们现在讲话都乱七8糟滴，你要多点来，受点渲染，嘿嘿~

小case：啊，偶们可能有点误导你了~~那个，偶们之前一直在说的JJ都是针对数学来说的，因为大家都觉得数学的JJ最重要嘛，所以就take it for granted了，sorry...作文当月高频当然重要，但是黄金80还是得看，至于题库要不要看那见仁见志了，时间比较松动的看了也米有坏处。（偶是米有看题库的，不知其他JM如何了。。。）

呼~偶口水真系粉多~~汗

lxzjojo

god，还是漏了一样米说，倒~~

小case同学，那个取非是对主句的主要动词取非，就像做SC一样，修饰成分/插入成分都不用看它。就举上面晶晶的那一题作例子，你对C取非的话就是：

The collection fee will induce residents to dump their trash in the parklands illegally.（那个NOT去掉啦－收钱的话人们就会到偷偷滴到parkland非法扔垃圾啦，这个显然会令原结论不成立嘛，所以是答案。）

不过对每个选项取非其实很累也很浪费时间，如你所说也不一定取得对。这个东东在分析的时候挺好用的，或者说你觉得哪个长得像是答案，取一下非求证一下也行。个人意见是，方法必须可以辅助你解题，而不是做自己的绊脚石，不合自己用的尽管大胆摒弃，偶其实在做题时就从来米有用过取非的方法涅~

XVVjing61

谢谢jojo姐和littlecase，我要好好研读一下

 

qiuping2006fr

回秋萍，LG＝老公，哈~偶们现在讲话都乱七8糟滴，你要多点来，受点渲染，嘿嘿~

Thank you! Maybe I am really too old to understand some of our words.