ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: wei_wangyan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] Sailing to success(快乐备考,携手同行)

[精华] [复制链接]
1171#
发表于 2006-12-31 09:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wei_wangyan在2006-12-30 10:17:00的发言:

偶上传完毕,晶晶,你去看看吧,希望会有帮助。

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=217223

做的有什么不好的,千万别笑话哈。

Jojo " 闹闹越来越有大将之风鸟"   同意! 

谢谢闹闹,一定好好研读。

1172#
发表于 2006-12-31 10:04:00 | 只看该作者
大家早上好~丽香怎么还米有回来涅?!几天米有见她,想得慌呐哈~
1173#
发表于 2006-12-31 12:13:00 | 只看该作者

今天再来看闹闹的问题,

Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to increase its resistance to insect pests. According to farmers’ reports, the amount of insecticide needed per acre to control insect pests was only slightly lower for those who tried the modified seed than for those who did not. Therefore, since the modified seed costs more than ordinary seed without producing yields of higher market value, switching to the modified seed would be unlikely to benefit most cotton farmers economically.

是基因改变是为了增加自身抵抗虫害的能力, 就美亩所用的杀虫剂的数量而言,modified seed 的用量比ordinary seed只少一点点,从此推出:modified seed 比ordinary seed 成本要大,而没有产生更高的市场价值,所以,改用modified seed 不会造福农民兄弟。

most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?

1,明确目的, 评价结论-- 改用modified seed 不会造福农民兄弟。

2,推导思路, genetic modifications 是为了increase its resistance to insect pests----〉modified seed 使用的农药少---〉(农药要花钱)花钱就少—〉benefit  famers

3,做题, 所以e最好的了,不管农民是否使用modified seed,他们都需要使用大量的农药,加强了结论,改用modified seed 的确 不会造福农民兄弟。

 Whether most of the farmers who tried the modified seed did so because they had previously had to use exceptionally large quantities of insecticide

至于b, out of scope, 文中只有两个比较对象,modified seed & ordinary seed ,

                                   一条主线,pesticide使用的多少——〉是否bebefit famers

other crops in B is irrelative to the arguement

           

1174#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-12-31 14:22:00 | 只看该作者

偶现在也想杀人!!!!!!!!!!!

天津的烂图书馆,连个电源都没有!!!!!!!!!!!

偶买的化妆棉从来不用,今天,把它塞在耳朵里了。。。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-31 14:54:01编辑过]
1175#
发表于 2006-12-31 15:25:00 | 只看该作者

不用化妆棉阿,多浪费啊,你的化妆棉从来不用,可以给我嘛,不要糟蹋阿,

你可以去买耳塞,效果很不错啊,我一直在用。在CD上看说屈臣氏有卖的,可以去看看。

切忌心浮气躁,老实念佛。

我把我的思路写了一下,看看对你有点启发没???

吃口西瓜败败火,

1176#
发表于 2006-12-31 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
我一直以为wei_wangyan是在国外复习的mm,今天才知道mm是天津的……
1177#
发表于 2006-12-31 16:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用XVVjing61在2006-12-31 12:13:00的发言:

今天再来看闹闹的问题,

Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to increase its resistance to insect pests. According to farmers’ reports, the amount of insecticide needed per acre to control insect pests was only slightly lower for those who tried the modified seed than for those who did not. Therefore, since the modified seed costs more than ordinary seed without producing yields of higher market value, switching to the modified seed would be unlikely to benefit most cotton farmers economically.

是基因改变是为了增加自身抵抗虫害的能力, 就美亩所用的杀虫剂的数量而言,modified seed 的用量比ordinary seed只少一点点,从此推出:modified seed 比ordinary seed 成本要大,而没有产生更高的市场价值,所以,改用modified seed 不会造福农民兄弟。

most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?

1,明确目的, 评价结论-- 改用modified seed 不会造福农民兄弟。

2,推导思路, genetic modifications 是为了increase its resistance to insect pests----〉modified seed 使用的农药少---〉(农药要花钱)花钱就少—〉benefit  famers

3,做题, 所以e最好的了,不管农民是否使用modified seed,他们都需要使用大量的农药,加强了结论,改用modified seed 的确 不会造福农民兄弟。

 Whether most of the farmers who tried the modified seed did so because they had previously had to use exceptionally large quantities of insecticide

至于b, out of scope, 文中只有两个比较对象,modified seed & ordinary seed ,

                                   一条主线,pesticide使用的多少——〉是否bebefit famers

other crops in B is irrelative to the arguement

           

MM尽量在分版中讨论相关题目好么,感谢配合啦!!

这里好热闹啊,都118页了!

1178#
发表于 2006-12-31 23:43:00 | 只看该作者

各位亲爱的JM们,新年的钟声很快就要响起啦,新的一年快要到啦~~

在此预祝大家身体棒棒,学习牛牛,心情好好,万事顺顺~~~

撒花

献吻

上礼

1179#
发表于 2006-12-31 23:49:00 | 只看该作者

我就顺着jojo姐的话说了

祝大家猪年吉祥,时时刻刻都开心,分分秒秒都快乐

希望每个人都能梦想成真

1180#
发表于 2007-1-1 00:54:00 | 只看该作者
新年快乐
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-19 01:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部