ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 TN (JROT)

00:00:00

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain. Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1491|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]请教TT4-20 Boldface

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-7 11:10:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]请教TT4-20 Boldface

Q20:

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.  Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way.  Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.  Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation.  Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

 

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
  2. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
  3. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.
  4. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.
  5. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2006-8-8 02:52:00 | 只看该作者

is the answer A?

different from other BF that have two counteracting arguments or conclusions, this one only involves one argument, that is to reduce total payouts on car-theft claims without dropping any policies which contributed to the current situation.

first BF tells us that it's not possible to drop those car-theft policies(rule out), so the company worked out another way to reduce the payout, then the second BF is the alternative.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-8 18:51:00 | 只看该作者

是A阿  我选的是B。。。

看了你的解释有点明白

地板
发表于 2007-6-26 16:20:00 | 只看该作者
A
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 12:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部