ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 16278|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD30-38的答案是什么?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-4 04:02:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD30-38的答案是什么?

Q38:

The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease.  The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil.  This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread.  Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

 

  1. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
  2. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
  3. Typhus is generally fatal.
  4. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested.
  5. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.

不知道答案是什么?

大家帮忙回答一下吧,谢谢

沙发
发表于 2006-8-27 23:01:00 | 只看该作者

我下载的GWD的答案是A,但不是很明白,顶起来,求解.

板凳
发表于 2006-8-31 20:31:00 | 只看该作者

The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease.  The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil.  This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread.  Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

 

A.        The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.

B.        The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.

C.        Typhus is generally fatal.

D.       Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested.

E.        Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.

B(other than typhus)C(fatal)E(only food)无关

A取非è tetracycline deposits form after the bodies were buried

D取非è
            
Nubian grain
did not become contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested

 

我觉得D合理,A不就是已经出现在文中了--- The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline

Pls help!!

地板
发表于 2006-8-31 20:42:00 | 只看该作者

A是对的.A说的是那个deposits 不是后来生成的.如果是后来产生的话,文章说的推理不对了.

D说的东东已经在文章里说了.

This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread.

  1. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
      
  2. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
      
  3. Typhus is generally fatal.
      
  4. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-31 20:42:51编辑过]
5#
发表于 2006-8-31 22:24:00 | 只看该作者

Thank u so much!!

I got it!!

6#
发表于 2006-12-13 13:38:00 | 只看该作者
有NN可以说说文章逻辑关系吗?谢谢!
7#
发表于 2007-8-10 02:01:00 | 只看该作者

古人没得T病,今人发现其埋葬地遗留有某种抗生素的痕迹。古人常吃的谷物里(古人用这种谷物酿酒、做面包),富含这种抗生素。因此,食物里的这种抗生素帮助古人少得T病。问假设;

AThe tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.

抗生素的遗留物不是古人死后才弄来的;

A取非(削弱了原结论):

抗生素的遗留物是古人死后才弄来的;

推翻了之前的推理:因为如果是后来弄来的抗生素的遗留物,那就成为伪装现场了,呵呵!那抗生素在古人生前根本就不存在,古人还想靠这少得T病吗?那就得另找古人不得T病的原因了!
8#
发表于 2007-12-8 13:35:00 | 只看该作者
UP
9#
发表于 2008-11-14 15:29:00 | 只看该作者

当然是A。这题的前提是tetracycline是typhus的抗生素,因果关系是:因为tetracycline在N人的尸骨中出现,所以N人较低的typhus发病率要归功于tetracycline这玩意在N人的主要食物中出现。

A就是证明“因”有意义

10#
发表于 2009-3-13 05:21:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 07:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部