ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1067|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全A19一个以前没有的问题,不知有没有人和我想法一样

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-2 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

大全A19一个以前没有的问题,不知有没有人和我想法一样

19.   The U.S. census is not perfect: thousands of Americans probably go uncounted. However, the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate. Certainly some of the poor go uncounted, particularly the homeless; but some of the rich go uncounted as well, because they are often abroad or traveling between one residence and another.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends? B (C)

(A) Both the rich and the poor have personal and economic reasons to avoid being counted by the census.

(B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.

(C) The percentage of poor Americans uncounted by the census is close to the percentage of rich Americans uncounted.

(D) The number of homeless Americans is approximately equal to the number of rich Americans.C

(E) The primary purpose of the census is to analyze the economic status of the American population.

 

我认为B正确,因为只有美国人被分为穷富两类时,这两类人同时减少才会使the basic statistical portrait of the nation painted by the census is accurate。如果还有不穷不富的人,是不是就不合理了呢?

不知大家明不明白我的意思?欢迎给点意见。先谢谢各位了!!

沙发
发表于 2006-8-2 21:47:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-2 22:38:00 | 只看该作者

我看了很多解释C为什么对的帖子了。

但是感觉C有漏洞。如果还有一大部分人不包含在穷人和富人中,但这部分的人没有被漏记,那末这三部分人不是依旧不成比例吗?

地板
发表于 2006-8-2 23:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dreamyhoney在2006-8-2 22:38:00的发言:

我看了很多解释C为什么对的帖子了。

但是感觉C有漏洞。如果还有一大部分人不包含在穷人和富人中,但这部分的人没有被漏记,那末这三部分人不是依旧不成比例吗?

B) All Americans may reasonably be classified as either poor or rich.

you need to add some many more conditions in order to make B stand.

Further more, the focus of this argument is the rich and poor, which is mentioned through the whole context, but not people of the middle class.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-3 01:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部