14. Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above? A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat. B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts. C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings. D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws. E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts. 疑问,知道应该攻击,说没带保险带而伤害到他人的选项。但是,正确答案B的选项似乎看不出有说伤害到他人的说法。我的翻译:汽车保险率对汽车拥有者来说更高,因为需要付没有带保险带而受伤或死亡的人的赔款。 这里的people为什么不能理解为开车的人呢?不知道哪里理解错了。请指教。 |