ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Editorial:An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander's approval should no longer be required since the officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1763|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问GWD第10套17题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-28 22:19:00 | 只看该作者

问GWD第10套17题

17.Editorial:

 

An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.  Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient.  A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce.  The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted.  This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

 

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.
  2. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
  3. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
  4. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
  5. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.

这道题我看到了其他人的解释,但是我的问题太弱了,没有看到,所以又拿出来问了

(1)我到现在还没有弄清出,哪些话是Editorial说的?

(2)我觉得在第一个黑体字前面的部分都是用来支持第一个黑体字的结论的

既:第一个黑体字是建立在前面的论述上的,那为什么说the first proposal against which the editorial is directed,against如何解释啊?

所以,我的答案是第一个黑体字是顺理成章的,第二个黑体字是反对第一个的

望执教

沙发
发表于 2006-7-30 03:39:00 | 只看该作者

1. The whole paragraph is the editorial.

2. The final conclusion of the editorial is to reject the recommendation.  That's why it's against.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部