[原创]2006.7.21 上海机经, 回馈CD

UUHF

进来恭喜一下，原来你就是那个和我一个考场的Niu MM，厉害！

Leo2

4)VALUE 3.5 MILLION 的房子的 TAX 是 房子VALUE超出1.25MILLION 部分的25%, 问TAX 是房子VALUE 的几分之几.

我选了35%

Unless the question is worded incorrectly, I don't think the answer is correct. 

3.5-1.25=2.25

2.25*0.25=0.5625

0.5625/3.5=0.1607.....roughly 16%

yilan

以下是引用Leo2在2006-7-23 13:17:00的发言：

4)VALUE 3.5 MILLION 的房子的 TAX 是 房子VALUE超出1.25MILLION 部分的25%, 问TAX 是房子VALUE 的几分之几.

我选了35%

Unless the question is worded incorrectly, I don't think the answer is correct. 

3.5-1.25=2.25

2.25*0.25=0.5625

0.5625/3.5=0.1607.....roughly 16%

看别人的帖子上好像是1.35million的房子，答案是35%

robinst

1.       ky+2x=6, know slope=1/2, k’s value?

k= -4

 

2.       RC

Relationship between African and European sound and their music development

1^st – a general introduction

2^nd & 3^rd---introduce African sound 特点, 为什么可以用音乐来表达，
        与欧洲的相比的不同。 4^th ----- used an example of African drum, a music instrument that uses different emphasis on the drum face to express different meaning, just as African sound does.

文中出现过的我觉得搞的单词：timbre，
            chord，pitch 文章就是围绕这几个单词展开的，
        大概都属于声音的一些特点。

 

1^st question, infer 题. Which of the following is not used by EU sound to express a transition of meaning. (记得好象是Timbre…)

2^nd
            也是infer题，
        但是忘记了。。。

3^rd, 好象是问第一段在全文的作用

4^th, 好象是问第二第三段是为了表达什么

5^th, 问最后那个非洲鼓乐器的这个例子是为了说明什么

 

 

CR 考到了天山里的一题，
        说一个地方的大的RAINFALL，
        中的RAINFALL，
        和小的RAINFALL 如何划分，
        然后给了数据，
        叫推论以下可能正确。大家自己搜索一下题目。

 

CR最后一题考了一个BOLDFACE，
        说A地方的某个类型的汽车保险COVER一个险，
        这个险在A地方申报赔偿的%比别的没有COVER 这个险的地方多一半。
        但是，
        说A地的人慌报多了一半的说法是无依据的, 因为。。。。。。。（翻出来的部分是划线的）

答案 the first is a situation whose implication is discussed in the argument. The second is the main conclusion of the argument.

 

其他CR考到的都很简单，
        没记忆了

RC 两篇很简单，
        短的；但是两篇很长比较难，
        但是另一篇难的我怎么也想不起来了。。。

 

SC普遍我觉得都比较简单。。。基本上没有碰到我觉得有疑问的。

有一题SC大概是GWD里的，
        说Fossils from a sloth… 你们自己去查查吧。出现过主谓单复的，
        平行的， SO THAT 这些类型的题目。

所有我想的起来的东西都在这里了, 希望对大家有用啊

祝大家杀G成功!!!

robinst

以下是引用mba06在2006-7-23 8:19:00的发言：
是B。

哭死, 竟然做到过的题目...以前的答案是错的.....

robinst

以下是引用louisalz在2006-7-23 11:11:00的发言：

再请LZ帮忙确认一下这题吧

2^33 + 2^34- 2^25=?
2^8(2^25)+2^9(2^25)-2^25

=(2^25)(2^8+2^9-1)

=(2^25)(256+512-1)

=767(2^25)

=(2^25)(2^8+2^9-1)

=(2^25)(256+512-1)

=767(2^25)

=(2^25)(2^8+2^9-1)

=(2^25)(256+512-1)

=767(2^25)

若原题为2^33 + 2^34- 2^35=?

那么结果应该是 －（2^33）

题目已经改正了....2^33 - 2^34+ 2^35=?

xiaoerhei

请robinst帮确认一下，你说的CR中关于汽车保险的是不是下面两题（画线部分可能跟你遇到的稍有差别），

1.         GWD-30-Q28

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.  Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.  Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators:  that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious.  Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

1. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
2. The first is claim that has been used to support a position that the argument accepts; the second is a position that the argument rejects.
3. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.
4. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.
5. The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends.

答案：D   

1.         GWD-30-Q26

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.  Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.  These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious:  clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

1. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the argument on the accuracy of that finding.
2. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.
3. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.
4. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that the argument accepts.

5. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.  

答案：C     

louisalz

谢谢robinst的贡献。

BTW， 看了你的SPACE，很精致，很喜欢。我也超爱狗狗，每次到了宠物店就挪不动步子了，只是目前还木有条件养它们。。。

chasegoal

如图, 问A B 的最短距离.

1) X=2

2) Y=3

不会做，帮帮忙，排个式子吧

robinst

以下是引用xiaoerhei在2006-7-23 22:48:00的发言：

请robinst帮确认一下，你说的CR中关于汽车保险的是不是下面两题（画线部分可能跟你遇到的稍有差别），

1.         GWD-30-Q28

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.  Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.  Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators:  that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious.  Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

 

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

 

1. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
2. The first is claim that has been used to support a position that the argument accepts; the second is a position that the argument rejects.
3. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.
4. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.
5. The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends.

答案：D   

1.         GWD-30-Q26

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.  Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.  These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious:  clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

 

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

 

1. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the argument on the accuracy of that finding.
2. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.
3. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.
4. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that the argument accepts.

5. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.  

答案：C     

1.         GWD-30-Q28 ---- the same with this one.