ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective.then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

The economist's argument makes which of the following assumptions?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1649|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问0G130D选项

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-21 21:29:00 | 只看该作者

问0G130D选项

130. Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

 

The economist's argument makes which of the following assumptions?

(A) Bank failures are caused when big borrowers default on loan repayments.

(B) A significant proportion of depositors maintain accounts at several different banks.

(C) The more a depositor has to deposit, the more careful he or she tends to be in selecting a bank.

(D) The difference in the interest rates paid to deposit
                
ors by different banks is not a significant factor in bank failures.
                

(E) Potential depositors are able to determine which banks are secure against failure.

E肯定是对的,但是想问D好像也有道理,因为取非后确实是对原文结论insurance的削弱啊

 

沙发
发表于 2006-7-22 10:56:00 | 只看该作者

对D取非,说利息是银行倒闭的一个重要得因素

个人感觉对文章得结论没起什么作用,文章得思路是“国家担保客户得存款---客户不顾银行是否安全---银行胡乱经营倒闭,因此客户多多得顾及一下银行是否安全---为争夺储户银行就会采取安全措施--不会倒闭”问一个assumption

E说潜在的储户可以决定哪个银行是安全的不会倒闭,---是一个架桥

D有点取非削弱的意思,但是我觉的银行利率和银行是否倒闭没有什么关系。对于结论“客户多多得顾及一下银行是否安全---银行就不会倒闭”没起到什么削弱的作用。

板凳
发表于 2006-7-22 10:57:00 | 只看该作者
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-22 16:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cicilla在2005-1-6 11:39:00的发言:

这道题目在我脑子里面呆了一个晚上。看了一些讨论,有说D是支持,有说取非。怎么会是支持呢?取非?取非以后要说也是削弱,那么加上一个not,不是很标准的not+削弱的假设题目的答案吗?

我觉得问题是出在原文的 An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failure中的那个partly,说明原文并没有排除其他的原因,所以D排除其他原因起不到假设的作用。如果原文说的是一个唯一的原因,那么D应该是一个正确的假设的答案。

不知道我理解得对不对?这道题让我对not+削弱的支持答案有了一个比较深刻地认识。感觉很值得讨论讨论。

谢谢gonghao,似乎上面这个说法我比较能接受一些哦
5#
发表于 2006-7-22 17:52:00 | 只看该作者

嗯,我没有感觉到这么细,我只是跟着题目的思路,傻乎乎选了个答案

我看到D觉得也有点像not+weaken,但是又觉的好像没什么用,题目里没有牵扯到这个利率的事情。况且就算取非,也就是说利率是非常重要的因素,并不是仅有的因素

但是读到E我就选了E

不过C版的理解的确很细致

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 03:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部