ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6170|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

几个假设题目?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-4-5 23:22:00 | 只看该作者

几个假设题目?

有些假设题,我的确不知如何下手?
The government provides insurance for individuals? band deposits, but requires the banks to pay the premiums for the insurance. Since it is depositors who primarily benefit from the security this insurance provides, the government should take steps to ensure that depositors who want this security bear the cost of it and thus should make depositors pay the premiums for insuring their own accounts.
6. Which of the following is assumed by the argument?

(A) Banks are not insured by the government against default on the loans the banks make.

(B) Private insurance companies do not have the resources to provide banks or individual with deposit insurance.

(C) Banks do not always cover the cost of the deposit-insurance premiums by paying depositors lower interest rates on insured deposits than the banks would on uninsured deposits.

(D) The government limits the insurance protection it provides by insuring accounts up to a certain legally defined amount only.

(E) The government does not allow banks to offer some kinds of accounts in which deposits are not insured.


The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.

(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.

(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.

(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.

(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home.



The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the worker's wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold.

The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses.

(B) Bell's management will refuse to increase its worker's wages.

(C) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike.

(D) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase.

(E) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase.

沙发
发表于 2003-4-6 19:43:00 | 只看该作者
第一:C。只有C不成立会导致文章的要求不当。
第二:B。支持了文中火灾未被提早发现的事实。
第三:E。既然子公司肯定被卖,则一定是为了涨工资,既然是为了涨工资说明除此之外别无它法。
板凳
发表于 2003-4-6 23:22:00 | 只看该作者
我先来回答一道题,第2题,我觉得应该选择C

本题前提是smoke detectors 这个装置的增加并没有增加对家庭火的发现情况。结论是解释这个前提:原因要么是without batteries ,要么是inoperative for some other reason。


C取非以后就成了all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated. 必然结论必然就不成立了,因为结论中说的原因之一是没有装置电池。所以C是很好的假设。


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-6 23:22:57编辑过]
地板
发表于 2003-4-7 00:50:00 | 只看该作者
3。我选C,取非后无法推出结论。
5#
发表于 2003-4-7 01:25:00 | 只看该作者
2. 我选择D. 因为监测器的增加未能提高预报率,只能解释为其效率降低,inoperative的比例上升。
B只有绝对数字的增加,而比例却可能降低,应该不对。
C,battery只是inoperative的一个方面,所以有否安装battery,与结论并无关系。事实上battery只是个陷阱,原文的含义就是over half of the domestic smoke detectors are inoperative 。



[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-7 1:38:35编辑过]
6#
发表于 2003-4-7 18:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用nobody在2003-4-7 0:50:00的发言:
3。我选C,取非后无法推出结论。


我同意nobady的观点,选C


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-7 18:04:08编辑过]
7#
发表于 2003-4-7 18:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用shany在2003-4-7 1:25:00的发言:
2. 我选择D. 因为监测器的增加未能提高预报率,只能解释为其效率降低,inoperative的比例上升。
B只有绝对数字的增加,而比例却可能降低,应该不对。
C,battery只是inoperative的一个方面,所以有否安装battery,与结论并无关系。事实上battery只是个陷阱,原文的含义就是over half of the domestic smoke detectors are inoperative 。


shany 版主,难道我奋勇直前地就冲进了陷阱里,哎,请shanny 版主帮我指点一下,我现在还认为自己冲进的不是陷阱呢?

我觉得C 取非以后就变成了所有的都装了电池,而结论中说因为超过一半的都没有装电池或是 因为其他操作不当的,言外之意是肯定了没有安装电池是原因之一,可是C取非后是都装了电池,这与结论中说没有安装电池是原因之一矛盾呀?

多谢shany 版主了!




[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-7 18:21:52编辑过]
8#
发表于 2003-4-7 20:48:00 | 只看该作者
haha 看来对假设题用取非的方式还是有帮助,没有上过辅导班,就算在这里上了。
9#
发表于 2003-4-7 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
>>C取非以后就成了all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated. 必然结论必然就不成立了,因为结论中说的原因之一是没有装置电池。所以C是很好的假设。

即使所有的监测器都是电池驱动,依然可能没有安装电池,甚至加强了电池作为失效原因的可能性。所以C取非后并没有削弱,而是加强,C不能作假设。
原文结论的重心为inoperative,但选项却用电池以偏概全,如上面的解释,只可能产生假设过分(即加强),并非必要条件。所以正确的选项应有中心词inoperative,而不仅是其中的某个因素。C选项只有battery, 仅从重心而言,已然变化,对这种答案必须慎之又慎,极可能是陷阱。
个人看法,欢迎继续讨论。
10#
发表于 2003-4-9 23:02:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用shany在2003-4-7 23:41:00的发言:
>>C取非以后就成了all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated. 必然结论必然就不成立了,因为结论中说的原因之一是没有装置电池。所以C是很好的假设。

即使所有的监测器都是电池驱动,依然可能没有安装电池,甚至加强了电池作为失效原因的可能性。所以C取非后并没有削弱,而是加强,C不能作假设。



太好了!谢谢shany版主指出了我的问题所在,原来我认为的是C取非后就成了所有的监测器都是没有安装电池,但是取非后应该是所有的监测器都是电池驱动的!!即使所有的监测器都是电池驱动,依然可能没有安装电池,你说的对!这个答案应该是不对的,看来我没有逃过温柔的陷阱呀。

还想问版主:如果改一下C项,改成不是所有的监测器都安装电池的,这个选项是不是应该对了呢?


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-9 23:03:50编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-11 05:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部