以下是引用tianc在2006-7-15 10:21:00的发言：这篇文章见TT GWD 4的 35-37~~~我今天刚做到~~呵呵" Please post it here, Please, will take test tomorrow morning. thanks!!!!!!!! TT GWD4 Q35 to Q37: The experience of British business in Iran between the 1860’s and the 1970’s is one example of the changing Line importance of British enterprise in Asia (5) as a whole. Before 1914 British busi- ness established and dominated Iran’s modern industrial and financial sector; in the 1920’s this domination began to wane; by the 1960’s British enterprise (10) was of little importance in the Iranian economy. While in Japan and India the decline of British business was primarily a function of the rise of strong indige- nous business groups, in Iran, by (15) contrast, the government played a large role in both challenging British commercial interests and stimulating locally owned enterprise. Periodic surges of intense Iranian economic (20) nationalism must be understood partly as a reaction to the close relations between British business in Iran and the British government. In retrospect, it is possible to see the uneasy and (25) ambiguous nature of this relationship. It is true that the British Imperial Bank in Iran was never entirely a tool of the British government, and that the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company did not take its (30) orders from the British government, despite the 51 percent government shareholding. However, the relationship between British business and the British government was sufficiently close that (35) many Iranians understandably viewed the oil company and the bank as sym- bols of a British imperialist policy. Q35: The primary purpose of the passage is to - evaluate a country’s solution to a problem
- describe differing perceptions of a historical event
- contrast historical events in two countries
- provide an explanation for a historical phenomenon
- challenge an accepted explanation for a historical change
Answer: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q36: The passage suggests which of the following about British business in Japan and India as compared to British business in Iran? - British business in Japan and India received less support from the British government than did British business in Iran.
- During the early twentieth century, British business played less of a role in the Japanese and Indian economy than it did in the Iranian economy.
- The governments of Japan and India played less of a role in the changing status of British business than did the government of Iran.
- The types of enterprises conducted by the British in Japan and India were significantly different from the enterprises conducted by the British in Iran.
- British business in Japan and India declined more gradually than did British business in Iran.
Answer: Q37: The author of the passage mentions the British government’s shares in the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company most probably in order to - demonstrate the British enterprise in Iran was controlled by the British government
- contrast British-run businesses in Iran with Iranian-run businesses in Iran
- show how joint British and Iranian enterprises were encouraged by the British government
- illustrate a point about the financial difficulties faced by British businesses in Asia
- suggest a reason for Iranians’ perception of the role British government played in British business
Answer:
参考答案：DCE
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-15 11:15:44编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2006-7-15 10:21:00
楼主
