og79的D再问一次【之前的帖子没看明白】

wycg

以下是引用gonghao在2006-6-25 15:59:00的发言：

难道你的意思是

yes和no都是reply部分发出的？

是的.

gonghao

明白了

在催眠的过程中，听见才有回答，且答案只有yes，表示听见。要么就是沉默，表示没有听见

NO在催眠过程中不是正常的答案，NO只有当清醒了以后，别人问起来，才会回答

ProfCPA

这道题有点象，有人敲门问“里面有人吗”，里面有人说“没有”。。。

我今天做到这题，感觉是我做到的CR里面最难的了。。。-.-

感觉OG11的解释还算清楚一点

fantasy06

A,C,D, and E in fact pinpoint the weeknesses of the theory from different aspects. 

Why A is right? How to eliminate C,D and E?  What's the reasoning line for FLAW questions?

Please advise.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-17 9:02:22编辑过]

fantasy06

以下是引用gonghao在2006-6-25 16:37:00的发言：

明白了

在催眠的过程中，听见才有回答，且答案只有yes，表示听见。要么就是沉默，表示没有听见

NO在催眠过程中不是正常的答案，NO只有当清醒了以后，别人问起来，才会回答

When I was reading the first sentence in the stimulus --"When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply "No." "  --  I noticed the response " No" is againt common sense, the subject should answer "Yes" instead when prompted in hypnosis state.

The reasoning for each choice:

A -- use the theory to contradict its evidence

B-- irrelevant

C-- challenge the theory's assumption

D-- challenge the theory itself,  because either deaf part or response part will be in charge and hence the answer cound be "yes", "no" or "unresponsive" rather than "no" alone

E--challengge the theory itself, because if selves can be dissociated, hearing part can also exist besides deaf part and response part.

Why A is right?  How to eliminate C, D and E?

shirley8707

up up

rattledrum

原文一共两句话：

现象（第一句）：when hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "no"

解释现象（第二句）：some theorists try to explain......from the part that replies. =>人催眠后被分为两部分，聋的一部分只听，不聋的一部分只说。所以，问被催眠的人是不是聋子时，他回答"NO"。

(A) why does the part that replies not answer "yes"?

     对“现象解释”提问。

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?

     对"现象"提问，和“现象解释”无关。

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?

     对"现象"提问，和“现象解释”无关。

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

     和原文的“现象解释”不冲突；原文的解释就是一种说明，为什么被催眠的人都回答NO。