斯坦福和哈佛的区别？

lecool

发错。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-24 15:09:44编辑过]

lecool

以下是引用FortheCountry在2006-6-24 14:21:00的发言：

OK.  data tells.  i m not sure, so i said, "maybe".

pls find more data to support your point: data in different yrs (after 2001, pls) if u r interested... 最好能看到 录取的人的平均分 instead of 入学的人的平均分.  maybe it will make big differences. but maybe u r still right that stanford's score is in the high side.

my point is that stanford doesn't put much attention to your GMAT score (HBS neither). stanford's higher score doesn't come from its love to high score, but simply from its high selectivity.

HBS's love to GPA is obvious.  look, HBS 3.64, stanford 3.56, wharton 3.52, MIT, 3.5, Kellogg 3.45, chicago 3.5, columbia 3.4, tuck 3.3

if u really loves data, let me show u: GPA:  (3.64-3.56)/4.0=2% while GMAT (712-707)/800=0.625% -- you can see the gap, but also consider that stanford's admission rate is only 2/3 of hbs's.

bush那个例子没啥好说的, bw forum上很多人争论这个, 有些人觉得好, 有些人觉得可笑. it's up to u.

"stanford's higher score doesn't come from its love to high score, but simply from its high selectivity"

you should add "maybe" into it again.

Looks like everything could be explained by "its high selectivity".

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-24 15:13:40编辑过]

laolao123

以下是引用FortheCountry在2006-6-24 14:31:00的发言：

怪不得.

还早呢, 3年以后什么都会变, 很大可能你不要做ibd了. :-)) 

hehe，我说去做金融而已，最想做pe，不过看看mba后直接去去不去得了啦。

你是去wharton吗？

FortheCountry

以下是引用laolao123在2006-6-24 19:01:00的发言：

hehe，我说去做金融而已，最想做pe，不过看看mba后直接去去不去得了啦。

你是去wharton吗？

drop me a message with your msn if u want. i will try to answer your question in more details.

FortheCountry

以下是引用lecool在2006-6-24 15:08:00的发言：

"stanford's higher score doesn't come from its love to high score, but simply from its high selectivity"

you should add "maybe" into it again.

Looks like everything could be explained by "its high selectivity".

on this point, i believe i know about mba application much better than u do. so i don't add "maybe" here.

sunjie38

to laolao123,

请问你是上海的ba还是北京的ba?

我是上海的ba, keep in touch

djcong

刚才收拾东西，发现一个去年参加stanford information session的资料，上面有class 2006的资料。来自finance including investment banking, hedge funds, private equity, venture capital and assest management 比例为23%，咨询18%。不知道是否说明一些问题。

另外，median gmat 711。分数对于越是top的学校越不重要，因为学校不需要你的高分数提高排名中的分数参数，更重要的是，中国学生分数没有低到拉学校后退的地步，因为分数的原因决定申请这个不是那个没有意义

现在形式真是不一样了。麦家都发这么多offer了。。。

Lord_of_Sword

以下是引用tuzq在2006-6-23 23:43:00的发言：

................

Of course Stanford is not for managers.........Stanford is for entrepreneurs....hbs in fact educates more managers, of course general managers.

tuzq 还是很权威滴。lz小妹妹想去STANFORD，还要多向tuzq 请教阿。还看到Mr. Yale 了。hbs的咋没人冒头啊？

tuzq

以下是引用Lord_of_Sword在2006-6-25 12:41:00的发言：

tuzq 还是很权威滴。lz小妹妹想去STANFORD，还要多向tuzq 请教阿。还看到Mr. Yale 了。hbs的咋没人冒头啊？

您老就作为hbs的兄弟单位发发言吧.

飞过太平洋

从BW上转来一段，大家看看.

The real differences between S and H are in their drastically different cultures and different experiences. Broadly speaking, Stanford is much more touchie-feelie, entrepreneurial, and casual... HBS is more formal and corporate. I think this is the real dimension that Calypso8 and other S/H admits need to consider. Many-many-may people I have talked to were turned off by the cultures at either/or S/H when they attended... the graduation ceremony at S, for example, is a goofy event where people wear shorts... much different from the solemn and formal environment at HBS' graduation. Not everyone enjoys either or both of these styles.