ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: best800
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-26-4

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2006-12-11 20:16:00 | 只看该作者

i chose B.因为C可以构成削弱.

如果Hill and Dale销售的模式是B2B呢? 国家公元就是客户啊,那么C就是削弱

事实上我们不应该先入为主认为是销售给家庭的


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-11 20:25:34编辑过]
22#
发表于 2006-12-14 01:48:00 | 只看该作者

really thx

23#
发表于 2006-12-17 11:37:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chang2301在2006-11-22 16:00:00的发言:

I thought that people who prefer C might have done some extra assumption

The premise is "consumers planning to buy recreational equipment"

So we must do the reasoning on the basis of that premise.

C is out of scope because the word "visitor facilitie" is too vague

Someone has claimed that C means you do not have to buy euipment because the National Park will offer...

That is the extra conclusion.

Because the visitor facilities do not have any direct link with company's sale

Any extra assumption here is needless.

In other words, if the visitor facilities are improved, maybe will stimulate more people to buy the euipment

So C weaken rather than support the conclusion.

The answer should be B

Don't  think too much, this question is not hard.

My personal opinion...open to discuss...


totally agree

24#
发表于 2007-1-12 01:37:00 | 只看该作者

  个人认为,该题不严谨。但仅就该题而言。还是C相对好。

  B中 去camping 的人去take vacations overseas 了。camping 的概念应小于 vacations ,应该是它的子集。 这样的情况,就可能二种结果,去vacations的人可能买camping用具;也可能不买camping用具。其结果是不肯定的。所以,做为正确答案不合适。

  C中,可以肯定的得出一种结果,公园有可能提供设备了,消费者不需要买了,这种结果相对来说,较为肯定。做为正确答案相对合适。

25#
发表于 2007-2-15 22:51:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chang2301在2006-11-22 16:00:00的发言:

I thought that people who prefer C might have done some extra assumption

The premise is "consumers planning to buy recreational equipment"

So we must do the reasoning on the basis of that premise.

C is out of scope because the word "visitor facilitie" is too vague

Someone has claimed that C means you do not have to buy euipment because the National Park will offer...

That is the extra conclusion.

Because the visitor facilities do not have any direct link with company's sale

Any extra assumption here is needless.

In other words, if the visitor facilities are improved, maybe will stimulate more people to buy the euipment

So C weaken rather than support the conclusion.

The answer should be B

Don't  think too much, this question is not hard.

My personal opinion...open to discuss...


I can't agree more! 选C的人,请反驳这句话,谢谢。

26#
发表于 2007-2-20 22:29:00 | 只看该作者

我选了B,但是现在想想说不定C更好,B C都可以说明营业额不会增加的原因,但是最好答案只有一个,manager的judgement是do not expect a substantial increase。

B只是说了人们不会go camping,而转向overseas vacation,但是没说hiking的情况,也就是说expensive hiking equipment还是会substantial increase的!这和manager的judgement有一点冲突

而C,却同时提到了Camping和hiking, 公园会筹集资金去improve facilities-----哎哟,我写道这里突然觉得C也有问题了,公园筹集资金去improve facilities,难道不会向H&D购买吗?呀呀呀!!懒题,懒题!!有问题的题!!

说不定还是B好!

 

27#
发表于 2007-2-27 05:05:00 | 只看该作者

去camping的原因,不是因为那个地方没有地方住,而是就是体验camping 而是一种运动.

难道有了单车有了汽车就没人跑步了?

换句话说,就算公园买了,游人不用买了,但还是有人(公园)买了,那店的生意还是好的啊!

C绝对是错的.

28#
发表于 2007-3-16 22:31:00 | 只看该作者

一开始选b,错了之后仔细想了一下,b是典型的无关项。

文章说经济增长之后质量更好的、更贵的设备比经济不好使卖的多。这多出来的这部分是谁买的呢,就是hiking和camping这部分人买的,也就是说假如100人hiking和camping,那么他们在经济不好的时候会买lining的运动鞋,经济好了之后会买nike,adidas。而b选项里面说得那些人是这100人之外的那些,这些人在经济不好时不去hiking,经济好了之后本来想去后来决定旅行,所以这部分人根本不影响那100人把lining换成adidas的需求,也就是说buy higher quality,more expensive equipment的趋势没有受到影响。所以,b是典型的无关选项。

至于c为什么是对的,我也不明,排除法。

29#
发表于 2007-7-15 21:03:00 | 只看该作者

我同意chan2301的观点。总而言之这道c题答案太模糊了。

30#
发表于 2007-7-16 09:00:00 | 只看该作者
C肯定错啊。就算national park提供了camping 的用具,而导致游客不需要准备,那么这些需求只是从游客转移到了national Park 而已。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 10:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部