OG11-VERBAL65-66

soupset

66. Hardin argued that grazing land held in common(that is,open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing lan. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accure to the individual, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.

which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would be help explain the results of the srudy?

A) With the private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.

B) The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any indibidual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land/

C)An individual who overuses common frazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.

D)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more.with the consequence that the cosets to each user outweight the benefits.

E)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.

OG的解析偶也不明白，逻辑结构也不清楚。邦邦忙哪位？？

wycg

以下是引用soupset在2006-6-7 13:36:00的发言：

66. Hardin argued that grazing land held in common(that is,open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing lan. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accure to the individual, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition.

which of the following, if true and known by the ranchers, would be help explain the results of the srudy?

A) With the private grazing land, both the costs and the benefits of overuse fall to the individual user.

B) The cost in reduced land quality that is attributable to any indibidual user is less easily measured with common land than it is with private land/

C)An individual who overuses common frazing land might be able to achieve higher returns than other users can, with the result that he or she would obtain a competitive advantage.

D)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more.with the consequence that the cosets to each user outweight the benefits.

E)There are more acres of grazing land held privately than there are held in common.

OG的解析偶也不明白，逻辑结构也不清楚。邦邦忙哪位？？

注意原文说的"Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accure to the individual". 过度使用是因为benefits 对于rancher有利.而实际上正相反-公共的土地并没有被过度使用,D说出了一个原因就是反对原文的那句话,过度使用会导致cost 超过benefits,从而rachener们不会过度使用会公共的土地.

frostone

Exactly agreed.

soupset

以下是引用wycg在2006-6-7 21:03:00的发言：

注意原文说的"Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accure to the individual". 过度使用是因为benefits 对于rancher有利.而实际上正相反-公共的土地并没有被过度使用,D说出了一个原因就是反对原文的那句话,过度使用会导致cost 超过benefits,从而rachener们不会过度使用会公共的土地.

Hardin argued that grazing land held in common(that is,open to any user) would always be used less carefully than private grazing lan. Each rancher would be tempted to overuse common land because the benefits would accure to the individual, while the costs of reduced land quality that results from overuse would be spread among all users. （这里之前是说过度使用公共土地会令RANCHER 有利。）But a study comparing 217 million acres of common grazing land with 433 million acres of private grazing land showed that the common land was in better condition。（这里是结论，217的公共土地，与433的私人土地使用数字来看，公共土地没有过度使用，对把）

 

aiya!!之前没有读懂。。。为什么这样的不懂？！？！斑竹指点了一下，猜开窍啊~~

很糟糕啊我的情况！！！

Snevy

D)If one user of common land overuses it even slightly, the other users are likely to do so even more.with the consequence that the cosets to each user outweight the benefits.

這句話的翻譯要怎說好？

一個COMMON LAND的USER若是少过度使用一点，，其他的USERS也可能会少用一点，结果是COSTS大过BENEFITS！

我怎麽看都不对，哪位NN能帮忙开释一下？

zhiyinfeifei

3x