ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2894|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 1-03 BOLDFACE题,没有确定答案

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-5 00:59:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 1-03 BOLDFACE题,没有确定答案

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price.  Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product.  But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities.  Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

  1. The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.
  2. The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.
  3. The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.
  4. The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.  
  5. The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.

我的这版答案给的E,查过以往的贴,BCEA全有

我同意A。
文章说:科技领先索要高价  第一个黑体字:索要最高价的原因   第2个黑体字:不应所要最高价的原因,文章结论,因该所要低于最高价的价格  A完全对应 

大家讨论。。。

沙发
发表于 2006-6-5 03:35:00 | 只看该作者

支持B.

 

原文有两个strategy. 1) charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product. 2) charge less than the greatest possible price.

B: 前半句的
            
a certain strategycharge the greatest price. 后半句的that strategy指前半句的a certain strategy, charge the greatest price. 所以完全吻合原文.

 

A: 前半句正确. 后半句中course of action endorsed by the argument是指charge less than the greatest possible price, 而第二个boldface是支持 this course of action, 不是the course of action本身. 故错.

C: 前半句正确. 前半句中assumptiontechnology advances tend to be quickly surpassed, a certain strategycharge the greatest price. 后半句不应该是cast doubt on that assumption, 应是cast doubt on that strategy.

D: 前半句错. 应该是support of a strategy that argument criticizes, not endorses. 后半句建立在前半句错误上, 错上加错.

E: 前半句正确. 前半句中a certain strategycharge the greatest price. 半句的that strategy前半句中的a certain strategy, charge the greatest price, 故错. 半句应是: explain the reason of a NEW strategy.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-6-5 3:36:45编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-5 09:23:00 | 只看该作者

恩 有道理 同意A后半句错

请问楼上,也是把原文全部读完再看选项吗 ?

thx a lot

地板
发表于 2006-6-5 09:48:00 | 只看该作者

同意b

5#
发表于 2009-8-2 14:25:00 | 只看该作者

这题我选的是E,但是搞笑的是我这个版本的答案给的是B。

根据XDF老师GZW的笔记。大写的But等同于however,之前的BF为AW-,后面的BF为AW+,就是前反后支,前面的是文章反对的,后面是文章支持的。第一个在because后面,所以充当证据/原因。所以我选E-- The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.

大家讨论讨论

6#
发表于 2009-8-14 09:43:00 | 只看该作者

up

7#
发表于 2009-8-14 10:04:00 | 只看该作者
支持B,但是觉得凡是用assumption的都有点问题吧?因为assumption都是不言明的,文中已经提出的应该算是evidence,这个没分清的话,表明逻辑结构没弄清楚。证据和前提都没弄清区别。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 04:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部