XDF2.3

pengfei1102

Questions 2-3 are based on the following.

Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.

2.     The author’s method of attacking the charges of certain opponents of the new deficit-reduction law is to

(A) attack the character of the opponents rather than their claim

(B) imply an analogy between the law and some New Deal programs

(C) point out that the opponents’ claims imply a dilemma

(D) show that the opponents’ reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion（B）

(E) show that the New Deal also called for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget

3.     The opponents could effectively defend their position against the author’s strategy by pointing out that

(A) the expertise of those opposing the law is outstanding

(B) the lack of justification for the new law does not imply that those who drew it up were either inept or immoral

(C) the practical application of the new law will not entail indiscriminate budget cuts

(D) economic troubles present at the time of the New Deal were equal in severity to those that have led to the present law（E）

(E) the fact that certain flawed programs or laws have improved the economy does not prove that every such program can do so

第3 题E 什么意思

wycg

E是在说"就算是那些有缺陷的的法规能够促进经济的发展,也不能说它们就可以被批准".

pengfei1102

 does not prove that every such program can do so 是 “也不能说它们就可以被批准".”这个意思啊~

wycg

以下是引用pengfei1102在2006-5-31 14:47:00的发言：
 does not prove that every such program can do so 是 “也不能说它们就可以被批准".”这个意思啊~

根具文章我是这么理解的.

楼主有不同的理解吗?

babyyee

我认为第3题可以和第2题结合起来看，从第二题的B这个正确答案知道，NEW DEAL应该是以前的一个法案，和the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law 不同，所以第3题E的意思应该是虽然事实证明某种有错误的条款或法案（指代NEW DEAL）确实提高了经济，但是不代表所有的（EVERY）法案都是这样的，犯了以偏概全的错误。

pengfei1102

以下是引用babyyee在2006-5-31 18:55:00的发言：
我认为第3题可以和第2题结合起来看，从第二题的B这个正确答案知道，NEW DEAL应该是以前的一个法案，和the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law 不同，所以第3题E的意思应该是虽然事实证明某种有错误的条款或法案（指代NEW DEAL）确实提高了经济，但是不代表所有的（EVERY）法案都是这样的，犯了以偏概全的错误。

应该是 以偏概全。谢谢。

谢谢 wycg

 babyyee

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-31 20:35:55编辑过]