ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1331|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

五月逻辑jj上面的题目(nefertari,就在这里)

[精华] [复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-30 07:14:00 | 只看该作者

五月逻辑jj上面的题目(nefertari,就在这里)

 我看你还没来,就先放到这里了。估计看完跟我一样满脑子都是螃蟹蛋了,呵呵。明天加油了~!

 

还非得rar才行,奇怪。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-30 7:58:29编辑过]

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-5-30 07:19:00 | 只看该作者

刚刚看到司mm找到的另外一篇:

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

 

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

 

A: Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

B: Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction除了油渗漏就没有其它可能造成污染的可能,如果这个成立,那么结论就成立。正确。
            

C: There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa.

D: Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

E: The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

板凳
发表于 2006-5-30 08:46:00 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!
地板
发表于 2006-5-30 09:00:00 | 只看该作者

我是猪脑子,竟然忘了给你email,还要辛苦你发个帖子给我!

多谢多谢!!!!

5#
发表于 2006-5-30 09:05:00 | 只看该作者
Good luck ladies,
6#
发表于 2006-5-30 23:31:00 | 只看该作者

我替楼主谢谢楼上的同志,她现在应该已经在考场了,我还在为下午的考试抱佛脚,^_^。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 10:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部