ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1152|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教TESTB-16题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-25 00:08:00 | 只看该作者

请教TESTB-16题

Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.

(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.

(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.

(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.A

(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.

答案选A,没太读懂,望指教。

沙发
发表于 2006-5-25 03:55:00 | 只看该作者
It's been asked before.  You can look around for more discussions.  The quick answer is that legal expenses is not limited to the amount awarded in damages, but also the money skept on unsuccessful suits.  A points out the flaw in the argument for not considering other expenses.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 23:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部