请教大牛们OG一道题31

dreamyhoney

本人是新入门的小字辈，请教大家这道题，始终看不出这个答案怎么驳斥的文章。

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served of privateenvironmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system,which is now run by the government.

which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

(a) those seeking to abolish all restricions on exploiting the natural resoutces of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.

谢谢啦！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-20 15:11:19编辑过]

xjlv128

题干有点……能贴全了嘛？

wycg

以下是引用dreamyhoney在2006-5-20 14:53:00的发言：

本人是新入门的小字辈，请教大家这道题，始终看不出这个答案怎么驳斥的文章。

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served of privateenvironmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system,which is now run by the government.

which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

(a) those seeking to abolish all restricions on exploiting the natural resoutces of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.

谢谢啦！！

原文是说"建议把由政府管理的公司交由私人管理,因为他们有更好的service能更好的保护national park system".

E说"那些主张废除保护national park system的人会进入到这些私人公司并进入到领导层", (暗是说他们不会对保护national park system有好处).就反对了原文说的.

做这类题就是要把文章和选项看懂,用排除法做.

dreamyhoney

谢谢楼上的，不过，这些人进入高层为什么就一定暗指不会实现他们的承诺呢？这不是违反了头脑空白原则吗？

wycg

以下是引用dreamyhoney在2006-5-20 15:55:00的发言：

谢谢楼上的，不过，这些人进入高层为什么就一定暗指不会实现他们的承诺呢？这不是违反了头脑空白原则吗？

是的,你说的对,做CR最不好的就是做无关推理.

这道题没有做无关推理.

原文说的是"私人公司对于保护national park system比government好", 而E说的是"私人公司的领导人都认为不因该保护national park system". 那你说要是把national park system给私人公司管的话,他们能管好吗(因为他们不认为national park system应改保护).是吧.

dreamyhoney

非常感谢楼上的这么好心解答我的问题，我好像已经明白a为什么对了。不过

b Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation abjectives.

这么答案错在那里呢？

谢谢

wycg

这是无关项.和文章没啥关系.